RegistryApplication · Docker

CVE-2020-29591

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-12-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Versions of the Official registry Docker images through 2.7.0 contain a blank password for the root user. Systems deployed using affected versions of the registry container may allow a remote attacker to achieve root access with a blank password.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Official Docker Registry images through version 2.7.0 contain a default blank password for the root user, allowing remote unauthenticated attackers to gain root-level access to the registry container via the Docker API or exposed registry ports.

MitigationUpgrade the Docker registry image to a version newer than 2.7.0 and ensure the root password is properly configured with strong authentication.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
RegistryApplication
Affected:= 2.5= 2.5.0= 2.5.1= 2.6.0= 2.6.1= 2.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the running Docker Registry image version
    Run 'docker images' or 'docker ps' and check the image tag for the registry (e.g., registry:2.5, registry:2.7.0)
    Affected if The image version is 2.5, 2.5.0, 2.5.1, 2.6.0, 2.6.1, or 2.7.0
  2. Confirm the registry is network-accessible
    Check if Docker Registry ports (typically 5000) are exposed via 'docker ps -p' or if the container is bound to 0.0.0.0
    Affected if The registry container port is mapped to a host port or bound to a reachable network interface
  3. Examine the registry authentication configuration
    Inspect the container for a mounted htpasswd file: 'docker exec <container> ls -la /auth' or check if REGISTRY_AUTH environment variable is set
    Affected if No htpasswd file exists or authentication is not configured, meaning default authentication may be in use
  4. Verify the root account password status
    If htpasswd exists, inspect its contents: 'docker exec <container> cat /auth/htpasswd' and check for root user entry
    Affected if The root user has no password set or uses a default blank password (empty string in htpasswd)

You are affected if you are running Docker Registry version 2.5 through 2.7.0 with the container network-accessible and no strong password configured for the root user in your authentication setup.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade the Docker registry image to a version newer than 2.7.0 and ensure the root password is properly configured with strong authentication.

Recommended fix High confidence

registry:2.8.0 (or any version after 2.7.0)

  1. 1. Stop the currently running Docker registry container using 'docker stop <container_name>'
  2. 2. Pull the fixed registry image version (2.7.1 or later, such as 2.8.0) using 'docker pull registry:2.8.0'
  3. 3. Review and update registry configuration to ensure proper authentication is configured (set a strong password for the root user)
  4. 4. Start the registry container with the new image: 'docker run -d -p 5000:5000 --name registry -v <config> registry:2.8.0'
  5. 5. Verify the registry is running and accessible with 'docker ps' and test authentication
Caveat Configuration changes may be needed; ensure htpasswd authentication file is properly configured with a strong password before starting the upgraded container

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Registry Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,390
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-29591 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-29591 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data