Email Security ApplianceApplication · Cisco

CVE-2020-3133

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-09-23
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 13.0 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the email message scanning of Cisco AsyncOS Software for Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass configured filters on the device. The vulnerability is due to improper validation of incoming emails. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted email message to a recipient protected by the ESA. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to bypass the configured content filters, which could allow malicious content to pass through the device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in Cisco AsyncOS Software's email message scanning allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass configured content filters on the Email Security Appliance by sending specially crafted email messages with improper validation that exploits the scanning logic.

MitigationApply Cisco's security patches for CVE-2020-3133; until patched, implement additional email filtering layers or manual inspection of suspicious emails as compensating controls.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Email Security ApplianceApplication
Affected:< 13.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Cisco Email Security Appliance model
    Check the device web interface under System Administration > Product Identification, or run the 'version' command in the CLI to confirm the hardware model and software version
    Affected if The device is not a Cisco Email Security Appliance (ESA)
  2. Determine the installed AsyncOS version
    Run the 'version' command in the ESA CLI, or check the web interface under System Administration > Software Upgrade. Compare the displayed version number to the 13.0 release
    Affected if The AsyncOS version is 13.0 or higher (versions below 13.0 are affected)
  3. Verify content filters are configured
    Check the ESA web interface under Mail Policies > Incoming Mail Policies, or run the 'filters' command in the CLI to list active content filters
    Affected if No content filters are enabled - the bypass vulnerability has no impact without configured filters
  4. Review mail logs for signs of filter bypass
    Examine the ESA mail logs (Mail Logs > Message Tracking in the web interface, or via the 'grep' or 'tail' commands in the CLI) for patterns where expected content-filtered messages were not quarantined or blocked
    Affected if Messages with suspicious content were delivered despite matching content filter rules

A Cisco ESA running AsyncOS versions below 13.0 with active content filters is vulnerable to CVE-2020-3133 if specially crafted emails bypass filter rules.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 13.0 or later
Fixed in 13.0
Interim mitigation

Apply Cisco's security patches for CVE-2020-3133; until patched, implement additional email filtering layers or manual inspection of suspicious emails as compensating controls.

Fix this in Email Security Appliance Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3133 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3133 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data