Remote Phy 120 FirmwareOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2020-3176

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-03-04
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 7.7 or later.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in Cisco Remote PHY Device Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute commands on the underlying Linux shell of an affected device with root privileges. The vulnerability exists because the affected software does not properly sanitize user-supplied input. An attacker who has valid administrator access to an affected device could exploit this vulnerability by supplying certain CLI commands with crafted arguments. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to run arbitrary commands as the root user, which could result in a complete system compromise.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a command injection vulnerability in Cisco Remote PHY Device Software where an authenticated local attacker with valid administrator credentials can execute arbitrary Linux shell commands with root privileges by supplying crafted arguments to certain CLI commands. The vulnerability stems from improper sanitization of user-supplied input in the CLI interface.

MitigationApply the vendor patch when available and enforce strict administrative access controls. Limit administrative accounts to only those who require it and monitor for unusual CLI activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Remote Phy 120 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:< 7.7
Remote Phy 220 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions
Remote Phy Shelf 7200 FirmwareOperating system
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Cisco Remote PHY device model
    Access the device CLI or device inventory and determine if the hardware is a Cisco Remote Phy 120, Remote Phy 220, or Remote Phy Shelf 7200
    Affected if The device is a Remote Phy 220 or Remote Phy Shelf 7200 (all versions affected), or a Remote Phy 120 (check version next)
  2. Check the installed firmware version
    Run the CLI command 'show version' or similar to retrieve the firmware version
    Affected if For Remote Phy 120: version is less than 7.7; for Remote Phy 220 or Shelf 7200: any version is affected since all are vulnerable
  3. Confirm administrative CLI access exists
    Verify that administrator-level CLI accounts are configured on the device
    Affected if Administrative credentials exist and can log into the CLI, which is required for exploitation
  4. Review for signs of command injection
    Check system logs, running processes, or unusual files in the filesystem that may indicate exploitation of this vulnerability
    Affected if Evidence of arbitrary shell commands or processes running that were not initiated by legitimate administrators

You are affected if you are running Cisco Remote Phy 120 firmware below version 7.7, or any version of Remote Phy 220 or Remote Phy Shelf 7200 firmware, and administrative CLI access is available on the device.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 7.7 or later
Fixed in 7.7
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor patch when available and enforce strict administrative access controls. Limit administrative accounts to only those who require it and monitor for unusual CLI activity.

Fix this in Remote Phy 120 Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3176 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3176 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data