Prime Network RegistrarApplication · Cisco

CVE-2020-3272

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-05-22
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 8.3.7.1 / 9.1.3 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the DHCP server of Cisco Prime Network Registrar could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation of incoming DHCP traffic. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted DHCP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a restart of the DHCP server process, causing a DoS condition.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in the DHCP server of Cisco Prime Network Registrar allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause denial of service by sending crafted DHCP requests. The issue stems from insufficient input validation of incoming DHCP traffic, which triggers a restart of the DHCP server process when exploited.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from Cisco when available. As an interim measure, restrict DHCP traffic to trusted sources using network ACLs or place the affected system behind a firewall to limit exposure to untrusted DHCP requests.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Prime Network RegistrarApplication
Affected:>= 8.3, < 8.3.7.1>= 9.0, < 9.1.3>= 10.0, < 10.1.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Cisco Prime Network Registrar installation
    Locate the software on the system using system inventory tools, package managers, or by checking for 'Cisco Prime Network Registrar' in installed programs or services
    Affected if The software is present on the system
  2. Identify the installed version
    Check the version of Cisco Prime Network Registrar using the vendor's command-line interface, registry entries, or installation documentation for your system
    Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 8.3 through 8.3.7.0, 9.0 through 9.1.2, or 10.0 through 10.1.0.0
  3. Verify DHCP server is enabled
    Check if the DHCP server component or service for Cisco Prime Network Registrar is running or enabled on the system
    Affected if The DHCP server service or process is active and listening for DHCP requests
  4. Assess network exposure of DHCP service
    Review firewall rules, network ACLs, or port bindings to determine if UDP ports 67/68 (DHCP) are exposed to untrusted or external networks
    Affected if DHCP traffic is not restricted to trusted internal sources and is reachable from untrusted networks

You are affected if Cisco Prime Network Registrar is installed with a version in the ranges 8.3 to 8.3.7.0, 9.0 to 9.1.2, or 10.0 to 10.1.0.0, and the DHCP server feature is enabled and accessible from untrusted networks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 8.3.7.1 / 9.1.3 / 10.1.0.1 or later
Fixed in 8.3.7.19.1.310.1.0.1
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from Cisco when available. As an interim measure, restrict DHCP traffic to trusted sources using network ACLs or place the affected system behind a firewall to limit exposure to untrusted DHCP requests.

Fix this in Prime Network Registrar Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3272 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3272 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data