CVE-2020-3376
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Device Manager application of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary actions on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to a failure in the software to perform proper authentication. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by browsing to one of the hosted URLs in Cisco DCNM. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to interact with and use certain functions within the Cisco DCNM.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn authentication bypass vulnerability in the Device Manager web application of Cisco Data Center Network Manager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to access certain hosted URLs and execute arbitrary actions on affected devices due to missing or improper authentication validation checks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.0\(1\)= 11.1\(1\)= 11.2\(1\)= 11.3\(1\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco DCNM is installedCheck for Cisco DCNM installation directories or running services. Common locations include /opt/cisco/dcm or check for processes named 'dcm' or 'dcnm'. On Windows, check Program Files for Cisco DCNM installations.Affected if Cisco Data Center Network Manager software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed DCNM versionAccess the DCNM web interface and navigate to the Help > About page, or check the installation directory for version files. Alternatively, run 'dcnm -version' from the command line if available.Affected if The installed version matches 11.0(1), 11.1(1), 11.2(1), or 11.3(1)
-
Verify Device Manager web application is accessibleAttempt to access the Device Manager URLs on the DCNM server. Common endpoints include /fm/deviceManager or similar paths under the main DCNM web interface. Check if port 8443 or 443 is listening for DCNM web services.Affected if The Device Manager web interface is reachable and responds to requests
-
Check if DCNM web services are exposed to networkUse network scanning tools (such as netstat, nmap, or similar) to verify if the DCNM web application ports (typically 8443 for HTTPS or 80 for HTTP) are listening and accessible from network locations.Affected if DCNM web services are exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
A system is affected if it runs Cisco Data Center Network Manager version 11.0(1), 11.1(1), 11.2(1), or 11.3(1) with the Device Manager web interface accessible over the network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the relevant Cisco security patch or upgrade to a patched version of DCNM as specified in Cisco's official security advisory for this vulnerability.
DCNM 11.3(2) or later stable release
- 1. Identify the current Cisco DCNM version installed in your environment
- 2. Access the Cisco Software Checker at tools.cisco.com to search for CVE-2020-3376
- 3. Download and apply the recommended fixed release for your 11.x version (11.3(2) or later for the 11.3 branch)
- 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by confirming the DCNM web interface is accessible
- 5. Test critical functionality to ensure the patch did not disrupt normal operations
- 6. Review Cisco release notes for any additional post-upgrade configuration requirements
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3376 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3376 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data