CVE-2020-3436
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web services interface of Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary-sized files to specific folders on an affected device, which could lead to an unexpected device reload. The vulnerability exists because the affected software does not efficiently handle the writing of large files to specific folders on the local file system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading files to those specific folders. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to write a file that triggers a watchdog timeout, which would cause the device to unexpectedly reload, causing a denial of service (DoS) condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in the web services interface of Cisco ASA and FTD allows unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbitrary-sized files to specific folders on the device. The software does not efficiently handle writing large files, which triggers a watchdog timeout causing an unexpected device reload and DoS condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 9.6.4.45<= 6.2.2>= 6.3.0, < 6.3.0.6>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.0.10>= 6.5.0, < 6.5.0.5= 6.6.0>= 9.8.0, < 9.8.4.25>= 9.9.0, < 9.9.2.80>= 9.10.0, < 9.10.1.44>= 9.12.0, < 9.12.4.2>= 9.13.0, < 9.13.1.12>= 9.14.0, < 9.14.1.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device product typeRun 'show version' on the device CLI. Look for 'Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance' or 'Firepower Threat Defense' in the output to confirm whether the device is an ASA or FTD appliance.Affected if The device runs ASA or FTD software
-
Determine the installed ASA software versionRun 'show version' and locate the 'Software Version' line. Note the full version number (for example, 9.8.4.10).Affected if The ASA version is < 9.6.4.45 OR falls within any of these ranges: >= 9.8.0 and < 9.8.4.25, >= 9.9.0 and < 9.9.2.80, >= 9.10.0 and < 9.10.1.44, >= 9.12.0 and < 9.12.4.2, >= 9.13.0 and < 9.13.1.12, >= 9.14.0 and < 9.14.1.15
-
Determine the installed FTD software versionFor FTD, run 'show version' from the FTD CLI or use the command 'system' followed by 'show version' from admin context. Note the full version number (for example, 6.4.0.5).Affected if The FTD version is <= 6.2.2 OR falls within any of these ranges: >= 6.3.0 and < 6.3.0.6, >= 6.4.0 and < 6.4.0.10, >= 6.5.0 and < 6.5.0.5, or equals 6.6.0
-
Verify if web services interface is enabledRun 'show running-config | include http' or 'show running-config | include web' to check if the ASDM/web management HTTP interface is configured. Also run 'show running-config vpn' to check for WebVPN configurations.Affected if HTTP server for ASDM or WebVPN is enabled and accessible from untrusted networks
The device is affected if it is a Cisco ASA or FTD running a version within the affected ranges AND has the web services interface (ASDM HTTP or WebVPN) enabled and exposed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.3.0.66.4.0.106.5.0.5
Apply the relevant Cisco software update/patch for ASA and FTD. Until patched, restrict or disable the web services interface from untrusted networks to reduce attack surface.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3436 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3436 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data