Webex Meetings ServerApplication · Cisco

CVE-2020-3471

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-11-18
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.0 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in Cisco Webex Meetings and Cisco Webex Meetings Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to maintain bidirectional audio despite being expelled from an active Webex session. The vulnerability is due to a synchronization issue between meeting and media services on a vulnerable Webex site. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests to a vulnerable Cisco Webex Meetings or Cisco Webex Meetings Server site. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to maintain the audio connection of a Webex session despite being expelled.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A synchronization flaw in Cisco Webex Meetings allows expelled users to maintain bidirectional audio connections. The meeting service and media service lack proper state synchronization—when a user is expelled from the meeting, the media service continues to carry the audio stream, enabling the expelled participant to continue listening despite being removed from the session.

MitigationApply Cisco's patches for Webex Meetings and Webex Meetings Server as they become available; verify that expelled users cannot retain audio connectivity through manual testing.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Webex Meetings ServerApplication
Affected:< 3.0= 3.0= 4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed Cisco Webex Meetings Server version
    Access the Webex Meetings Server admin interface or run the command 'show version' via CLI to retrieve the currently installed software version
    Affected if The installed version is less than 3.0, exactly 3.0, or exactly 4.0
  2. Verify media service is running
    Check the status of the Webex media service process using system monitoring tools or admin console - look for processes related to audio/media handling
    Affected if Media service is active and handling meeting audio streams
  3. Review meeting session configuration
    Examine the Webex Meetings Server configuration for session management settings, specifically the synchronization parameters between meeting service and media service
    Affected if Session state synchronization between meeting and media services is not explicitly configured or documented as patched
  4. Test user expulsion behavior
    Create a test meeting, join with two participants, then expel one participant while monitoring network connections from the expelled client side
    Affected if The expelled participant retains an active audio connection and can still hear meeting audio after removal from the session

A user is affected if their Cisco Webex Meetings Server is version 3.0 or 4.0 (or earlier than 3.0) and expelled participants can continue hearing meeting audio after removal.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.0 or later
Fixed in 3.0
Interim mitigation

Apply Cisco's patches for Webex Meetings and Webex Meetings Server as they become available; verify that expelled users cannot retain audio connectivity through manual testing.

Fix this in Webex Meetings Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,190
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3471 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3471 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data