CVE-2020-35197
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe official memcached docker images before 1.5.11-alpine (Alpine specific) contain a blank password for a root user. System using the memcached docker container deployed by affected versions of the docker image may allow a remote attacker to achieve root access with a blank password.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe official memcached Docker images before version 1.5.11-alpine contain a blank password for the root user, specific to the Alpine Linux variant. A remote attacker can exploit this to gain root access to the container.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.5.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify running Memcached containersRun 'docker ps' to list all running containers and look for containers using memcached imagesAffected if A Memcached container is running from an affected image
-
Check the Docker image versionRun 'docker inspect <container_id>' or 'docker images' to retrieve the memcached image tag/versionAffected if The image version is below 1.5.11
-
Confirm Alpine variantRun 'docker exec <container_id> cat /etc/os-release' or inspect the image metadata to verify the Alpine Linux variant is in useAffected if The container is running Alpine Linux variant of memcached
-
Check root user authenticationAttempt to connect to the container as root without a password, or inspect /etc/shadow or the container's user configuration for the root accountAffected if The root user has a blank password set
The environment is affected if a Memcached Docker container is running an Alpine variant image with version below 1.5.11 that has a blank root password.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.5.11
Upgrade memcached Docker images to version 1.5.11-alpine or later, which removes the blank root password. Ensure containers are rebuilt and redeployed with the fixed version.
memcached:1.5.11-alpine or later (for Alpine-based deployments); memcached:1.5.11 or later (for other base images)
- 1. Stop the currently running vulnerable memcached container
- 2. Pull the fixed memcached Docker image: docker pull memcached:1.5.11-alpine (or a later stable version)
- 3. Update your Docker Compose file or container configuration to reference the fixed image version (e.g., memcached:1.5.11-alpine)
- 4. Review and update any startup scripts or configurations that may have relied on the blank root password
- 5. Start the container with the new fixed image
- 6. Verify proper authentication is now required by attempting an unauthenticated connection (should fail)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-35197 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-35197 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data