CVE-2020-35215
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue in Atomix v3.1.5 allows attackers to access sensitive information when a malicious Atomix node queries distributed variable primitives which contain the entire primitive lists that ONOS nodes use to share important states.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn Atomix v3.1.5, a malicious Atomix node can query distributed variable primitives to access sensitive state information. The vulnerability allows unauthorized access to primitive lists that ONOS nodes use to share important states, resulting in information disclosure.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Atomix versionRun 'atomix --version' command, check the JAR file name in the deployment, or query the Atomix node API for version informationAffected if The installed version is Atomix 3.1.5 exactly
-
Determine if distributed primitives are in useReview application logs or configuration for usage of Atomix distributed primitives such as DistributedValue, DistributedMap, or DistributedList primitivesAffected if The environment uses Atomix distributed primitives to share state between ONOS nodes or other components
-
Inspect cluster authentication configurationExamine Atomix configuration files (atomix.conf or similar) for 'authentication' and 'authorization' provider settingsAffected if No authentication or authorization providers are configured for the cluster
-
Check cluster membership controlsReview cluster bootstrap and member admission configuration to determine if any node can join without credentialsAffected if The cluster allows unauthenticated or unauthorized nodes to join and query distributed primitives
A system is affected if it runs Atomix version 3.1.5 and uses distributed primitives for state sharing without proper node authentication and authorization configured on the cluster.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade Atomix to a patched version that properly authenticates and authorizes node requests for distributed primitives, or implement network segmentation to prevent unauthorized nodes from joining the cluster.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-35215 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-35215 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data