CVE-2020-35511
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA global buffer overflow was discovered in pngcheck function in pngcheck-2.4.0(5 patches applied) via a crafted png file.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA global buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the pngcheck function of pngcheck-2.4.0 (with 5 patches applied), exploitable through a specially crafted PNG file. This buffer overflow could potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service when the utility processes a malicious PNG file.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0= 11.0= 2.4.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify pngcheck is installedRun 'which pngcheck' or 'dpkg -l | grep pngcheck' on Debian systemsAffected if pngcheck is present on the system
-
Identify installed pngcheck versionRun 'pngcheck -v' or 'pngcheck --version' to obtain the exact version numberAffected if Version is 2.4.0 (with 5 patches applied)
-
Check Debian system versionRun 'cat /etc/debian_version' to determine the Debian releaseAffected if Running Debian 10.0 or 11.0 with pngcheck 2.4.0 installed
-
Determine exposure to untrusted PNG filesReview whether pngcheck is used in automated workflows or by users processing files from untrusted sourcesAffected if pngcheck processes PNG files from unknown or untrusted sources
You are affected if pngcheck version 2.4.0 is installed on Debian 10.0 or 11.0 and is used to process potentially untrusted PNG files.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate pngcheck to the latest patched version after the 5 patches. Avoid processing untrusted or unknown PNG files with vulnerable versions until patched.
pngcheck 2.4.1 or later (Debian security updates)
- 1. Update the package repository index on the Debian system: `sudo apt-get update`
- 2. Upgrade pngcheck to the latest available version: `sudo apt-get install --upgrade pngcheck`
- 3. Verify the installed version to confirm the upgrade: `pngcheck -version`
- 4. Test the updated pngcheck against the previously vulnerable version to ensure it handles malformed PNG files safely
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-35511 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-35511 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data