Resiliency PlatformApplication · Veritas

CVE-2020-36168

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-01-06
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Veritas Resiliency Platform 3.4 and 3.5. It leverages OpenSSL on Windows systems when using the Managed Host addon. On start-up, it loads the OpenSSL library. This library may attempt to load the openssl.cnf configuration file, which does not exist. By default, on Windows systems, users can create directories under C:\. A low privileged user can create a C:\usr\local\ssl\openssl.cnf configuration file to load a malicious OpenSSL engine, resulting in arbitrary code execution as SYSTEM when the service starts. This gives the attacker administrator access on the system, allowing the attacker (by default) to access all data, access all installed applications, etc.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Veritas Resiliency Platform 3.4/3.5 loads OpenSSL on Windows startup which attempts to load a non-existent openssl.cnf configuration file. A low-privileged attacker can create a malicious C:\usr\local\ssl\openssl.cnf to load a crafted OpenSSL engine, achieving arbitrary code execution as SYSTEM.

MitigationCreate a legitimate openssl.cnf configuration file in the expected location (C:\usr\local\ssl\) that disables engine loading, or restrict filesystem permissions to prevent unprivileged users from creating directories under C:\, or configure the service to run with reduced privileges.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Resiliency PlatformApplication
Affected:= 3.4= 3.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Veritas Resiliency Platform is installed
    Check for Veritas Resiliency Platform in Windows Programs and Features, or look for its installation directory (commonly in Program Files\Veritas)
    Affected if The software is installed and version is 3.4 or 3.5
  2. Confirm installed version matches affected range
    In Programs and Features, verify the version is exactly 3.4 or exactly 3.5, or check the product version via the installed binaries
    Affected if Installed version is 3.4 or 3.5 (exact match)
  3. Check if the vulnerable OpenSSL config path is writable
    Verify if a low-privileged user can create the directory C:\usr\local\ssl\ and write a file there, or check if this path already exists with weak permissions
    Affected if The C:\usr\local\ssl\ directory can be created or written to by a low-privileged user
  4. Verify the service runs with elevated privileges
    Check the Log On As account for the Veritas Resiliency Platform service in Windows Services (usually runs as SYSTEM or another privileged account)
    Affected if The service runs as SYSTEM or an account with administrative privileges

You are affected if Veritas Resiliency Platform version 3.4 or 3.5 is installed AND a low-privileged attacker can create or write files in C:\usr\local\ssl\ to inject a malicious OpenSSL engine configuration.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Create a legitimate openssl.cnf configuration file in the expected location (C:\usr\local\ssl\) that disables engine loading, or restrict filesystem permissions to prevent unprivileged users from creating directories under C:\, or configure the service to run with reduced privileges.

Fix this in Resiliency Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-36168 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-36168 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data