CVE-2020-3634
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedu'Multiple Read overflows issue due to improper length check while decoding Generic NAS transport/EMM info' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8053, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, Kamorta, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9625, MDM9635M, MDM9640, MDM9645, MDM9650, MDM9655, MSM8905, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS605, QCS610, QM215, Rennell, SA415M, Saipan, SC7180, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX20, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMemory corruption vulnerability in Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets where improper length validation during decoding of Generic NAS transport/EMM (EPS Mobility Management) information allows multiple read overflows. This occurs in the baseband processor's protocol stack handling mobile network communications, potentially allowing attackers to read sensitive memory contents or achieve code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device specifications or use system information tools (e.g., 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' on Android, or check BIOS/UEFI for embedded devices) to determine the exact Snapdragon or Qualcomm modem chipset modelAffected if The chipset matches one of the following: Apq8053, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Kamorta, Mdm9150, Mdm9205, Mdm9206, or Mdm9607
-
Check baseband processor firmware versionOn Android devices, use 'AT+CGMR' or check 'Settings > About Phone > Baseband version'; for IoT/embedded devices, consult OEM documentation or access baseband firmware via diagnostic interfacesAffected if The baseband firmware version cannot be verified as patched, or the device runs any firmware version on an affected chipset (all versions are affected)
-
Verify mobile network stack is activeConfirm the device has an active cellular radio and is configured to handle NAS (Non-Access Stratum) or EMM (EPS Mobility Management) protocols - check if the device connects to LTE/4G/5G networksAffected if The device actively processes mobile network communications via the baseband processor (this is the default state for most cellular devices)
The device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8053, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Kamorta, Mdm9150, Mdm9205, Mdm9206, Mdm9607) and processes cellular network protocols, since all firmware versions of these chipsets are vulnerable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply firmware updates provided by device OEMs/carriers; prioritize patching mobile devices, wearables, and IoT devices with affected Snapdragon chipsets given the 9.1 critical severity and network-adjacent attack vector.
- Contact the OEM or device manufacturer to obtain firmware updates addressing CVE-2020-3634
- Apply the OEM-provided firmware update that includes the security patch for the integer underflow vulnerability
- Verify the patch has been successfully applied by checking the firmware version or consulting OEM release notes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,320.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3634 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3634 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data