CVE-2020-3639
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedu'When a non standard SIP sigcomp message is received from the network, then there may be chances of using more UDVM cycle or memory overflow' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wearables in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8037, APQ8053, MDM9250, MDM9607, MDM9628, MDM9640, MDM9650, MSM8108, MSM8208, MSM8209, MSM8608, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, QCM4290, QCM6125, QCS410, QCS4290, QCS603, QCS605, QCS610, QCS6125, QM215, QSM8350, SA415M, SA6145P, SA6150P, SA6155P, SA8150P, SA8155, SA8155P, SA8195P, SC7180, SC8180X, SC8180X+SDX55, SC8180XP, SDA429W, SDA640, SDA660, SDA670, SDA845, SDA855, SDM1000, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM455, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM640, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM712, SDM845, SDM850, SDX24, SDX50M, SDX55, SDX55M, SM4125, SM4250, SM4250P, SM6115, SM6115P, SM6125, SM6150, SM6150P, SM6250, SM6250P, SM7125, SM7150, SM7150P, SM7250, SM7250P, SM8150, SM8150P, SM8350, SM8350P, SXR1120, SXR1130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Qualcomm Snapdragon processors' SigComp (Signaling Compression) implementation for SIP messages. When a malformed or non-standard SIP sigcomp message is received from the network, it can cause excessive UDVM (Universal Decompressor Virtual Machine) cycle consumption or trigger a memory overflow condition. This can lead to denial of service or potentially remote code execution. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable via network traffic without authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Inventory device chipset modelsIdentify all network-connected devices and determine their Qualcomm processor model numbers (Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8037, Apq8053, Mdm9250, Mdm9607, Mdm9628, Mdm9640) by reviewing device specifications, baseband firmware diagnostics, or SNMP/network inventory dataAffected if Any device is found using one of the affected chipset models listed in the CVE
-
Check baseband firmware versionQuery the baseband processor firmware version on identified Qualcomm devices using manufacturer diagnostic tools, AT commands (for modems), or device management interfaces. Compare the version against any available patch releases from Qualcomm or OEM vendorsAffected if The firmware version is older than available patches or, for 'all versions' products, no patch has been applied
-
Identify SIP/SigComp exposureDetermine whether SIP-based voice or messaging services are enabled and whether the SigComp compression feature is active on the device or network edge. Review VoIP/SIP server configurations, SIP proxy settings, and any SigComp-related parametersAffected if SIP services with SigComp compression are enabled and exposed to network traffic
-
Monitor for malformed SIP sigcomp messagesCapture and inspect network traffic on SIP ports (typically 5060/5061) for SIP messages containing SigComp compressed bodies. Look for anomalies in the UDVM bytecode, unusual decompression behavior, or messages that trigger excessive processingAffected if Malformed or anomalous SIP sigcomp messages are observed in network captures, or unexpected UDVM cycle consumption is detected on SIP-processing systems
A defender is affected if their environment contains devices using any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8037, Apq8053, Mdm9250, Mdm9607, Mdm9628, Mdm9640) that have not been patched, and those devices process SIP traffic with SigComp enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided security patches from Qualcomm and device OEMs. This is a firmware-level vulnerability that requires updating the processor firmware/baseband processor. For organizations, identify and inventory all affected devices and apply available security updates from device manufacturers.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3639 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3639 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data