CVE-2020-3643
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedu'Information disclosure issue can occur due to partial secure display-touch session tear-down' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables, Snapdragon Wired Infrastructure and Networking in APQ8009, APQ8017, APQ8053, APQ8076, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, IPQ6018, Kamorta, MDM9150, MDM9205, MDM9206, MDM9607, MDM9650, MSM8905, MSM8909, MSM8917, MSM8920, MSM8937, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996, MSM8996AU, MSM8998, Nicobar, QCM2150, QCS404, QCS405, QCS605, QCS610, QM215, Rennell, SA415M, SA515M, SA6155P, SC7180, SC8180X, SDA660, SDA845, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SDM850, SDX24, SDX55, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAn information disclosure vulnerability exists in the secure display-touch session tear-down process of multiple Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. The issue allows potential exposure of sensitive data during incomplete session cleanup when transitioning between secure display states. This affects processors across mobile, IoT, automotive, and infrastructure product lines.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Qualcomm chipset modelCheck the device's processor/chipset identification. On Linux/Android, examine /proc/cpuinfo or /sys/devices/soc0/soc_id. On automotive/IoT modules, check AT command responses or boot logs for the chipset identifier.Affected if The chipset matches one of the following: Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Ipq6018, or Kamorta.
-
Determine the firmware versionRetrieve the firmware version from the device. On mobile devices, check Settings > About Phone > Build Number or via 'getprop' commands. On IoT/automotive modules, consult vendor documentation or query the modem/secure processor subsystem via diagnostic interfaces.Affected if All firmware versions of the listed chipsets are affected by this CVE.
-
Confirm secure display-touch session capabilityVerify whether the device or module implements secure display and touch session handling. This feature is typically present in devices supporting secure UI, trusted execution environments, or mobile payment functionality. Check system logs (dmesg, logcat) for messages related to 'secure_display', 'trustedUI', or 'tee' (Trusted Execution Environment) initialization.Affected if The device implements and uses secure display-touch session functionality, which is required for this vulnerability to be exploitable.
-
Check for incomplete session cleanup indicatorsReview system and secure processor logs for any anomalies during display state transitions, particularly when exiting secure UI modes or switching between secure display states. Look for warnings related to session termination or cleanup.Affected if The device transitions between secure display states and the firmware exhibits incomplete session cleanup behavior during these transitions.
A device is affected if it uses any of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Apq8009, Apq8017, Apq8053, Apq8076, Apq8096au, Ipq6018, or Kamorta) and implements the secure display-touch session feature, since all firmware versions of these chipsets contain the vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply security firmware updates provided by Qualcomm and distributed through device OEM patch cycles. Users should verify their devices are running the latest vendor-provided security patches.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,320.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3643 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3643 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data