ConqueueApplication · Conqueue Project

CVE-2020-36437

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-08-08
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.4.0 or later.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in the conqueue crate before 0.4.0 for Rust. There are unconditional implementations of Send and Sync for QueueSender<T>.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The conqueue crate before 0.4.0 unconditionally implements Send and Sync traits for QueueSender<T> regardless of whether T is thread-safe. This is a soundness vulnerability because it incorrectly marks QueueSender as thread-safe even when T contains non-Send/Sync types like Rc<T>, potentially allowing data races and undefined behavior when non-thread-safe data is moved across threads.

MitigationUpgrade conqueue to version 0.4.0 or later which implements Send and Sync conditionally based on the thread-safety of T. If upgrading is not possible, avoid using QueueSender with non-Send/Sync types.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ConqueueApplication
Affected:< 0.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify conqueue dependency in project
    Search Cargo.toml files for 'conqueue' under [dependencies] or [dev-dependencies] and note the version specified
    Affected if conqueue is listed with a version constraint lower than 0.4.0 (e.g., '0.3', '0.2', or any wildcard like '*')
  2. Check Cargo.lock for exact conqueue version
    Open Cargo.lock and locate the [[package]] entry for name 'conqueue' to find the resolved version number
    Affected if The version field shows anything before 0.4.0 (e.g., 0.3.0, 0.3.1)
  3. Inspect QueueSender usage for non-Send/Sync types
    Search source code for QueueSender<T> instantiations and examine the type T being passed. Look for non-Send/Sync types such as Rc<T>, Cell<T>, RefCell<T>,RcCell<T>, or custom types not implementing Send or Sync
    Affected if QueueSender is instantiated with a type T that does not implement Send or Sync traits
  4. Check for cross-thread QueueSender movement
    Search code for patterns where QueueSender is moved between threads (e.g., spawned threads, thread::spawn closures capturing QueueSender, or passing QueueSender to cross-thread channels/APIs)
    Affected if QueueSender instances are moved across thread boundaries in code

The environment is affected if conqueue version is below 0.4.0 AND QueueSender<T> is used with types that do not implement Send/Sync AND those QueueSender instances are moved across threads.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.4.0 or later
Fixed in 0.4.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade conqueue to version 0.4.0 or later which implements Send and Sync conditionally based on the thread-safety of T. If upgrading is not possible, avoid using QueueSender with non-Send/Sync types.

Recommended fix High confidence

0.4.0

  1. Check your Cargo.toml for the current conqueue dependency version
  2. Update the conqueue version requirement to 0.4.0 or later (e.g., conqueue = "0.4.0")
  3. Run `cargo update conqueue` or `cargo build` to fetch the fixed version
  4. Verify the update was successful by checking the resolved version

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Conqueue Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-36437 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-36437 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data