CVE-2020-3673
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedu'Buffer overflow can happen as part of SIP message packet processing while storing values in array due to lack of check to validate the index length' in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wearables in Agatti, APQ8053, APQ8096AU, APQ8098, Bitra, Kamorta, MSM8905, MSM8909W, MSM8917, MSM8940, MSM8953, MSM8996AU, Nicobar, QCA6390, QCA6574AU, QCM2150, QCS605, QM215, Rennell, SA6155P, SA8155P, Saipan, SDA660, SDM429, SDM429W, SDM439, SDM450, SDM630, SDM632, SDM636, SDM660, SDM670, SDM710, SDM845, SM6150, SM7150, SM8150, SM8250, SXR1130, SXR2130
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerability in SIP message packet processing within Qualcomm Snapdragon chipsets. The vulnerability exists due to lack of bounds checking when storing values in an array during SIP message handling, allowing an attacker to overflow the buffer by providing an index exceeding the allocated array length.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your device chipset modelCheck the device specifications, hardware documentation, or system information to determine the Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset in use (e.g., Agatti, Apq8053, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Bitra, Kamorta, Msm8905, Msm8909w)Affected if The chipset matches one of the affected models listed in the CVE (Agatti, Apq8053, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Bitra, Kamorta, Msm8905, Msm8909w)
-
Determine the firmware versionCheck the device firmware or baseband version information typically found in device settings under 'About Phone', 'Baseband', or via AT commands on modem interfacesAffected if The device is running firmware on any of the affected chipset models (all versions of the listed firmware are affected)
-
Check if SIP service is enabledInspect the device or network configuration for SIP (Session Initiation Protocol) service settings. This may be in VoIP settings, telephony configuration, or network service settingsAffected if SIP service or VoIP functionality is enabled on the device
-
Verify SIP traffic exposureMonitor network traffic or check firewall rules to determine if the device is exposing SIP ports (typically port 5060) to untrusted networks or processing SIP messages from external sourcesAffected if The device processes SIP traffic from network sources, particularly untrusted or external sources
You are likely affected if your device uses one of the listed Qualcomm chipsets (Agatti, Apq8053, Apq8096au, Apq8098, Bitra, Kamorta, Msm8905, Msm8909w) and has SIP service enabled or processes SIP traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided firmware/security patches from Qualcomm to affected chipsets. Until patches are available, consider network-level filtering of SIP traffic and disable SIP services if not essential.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3673 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3673 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data