CVE-2020-37070
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCloudMe 1.11.2 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code through crafted network packets. Attackers can exploit the vulnerability by sending a specially crafted payload to the CloudMe service running on port 8888, enabling remote code execution.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCloudMe 1.11.2 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in its network service running on port 8888. Attackers can send specially crafted packets that overflow a buffer, allowing them to overwrite return addresses and execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the CloudMe service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify CloudMe installationCheck for CloudMe installation directories or installed programs (commonly in C:\Program Files\CloudMe or C:\Program Files (x86)\CloudMe on Windows; /opt/CloudMe or ~/CloudMe on Linux)Affected if CloudMe software is found on the system
-
Determine installed versionLocate version information in the CloudMe installation folder (often in an About dialog, version.txt, or the executable properties)Affected if Installed version is 1.11.2 or earlier (no fixed version was provided; treat 1.11.2 as affected)
-
Verify port 8888 is listeningRun 'netstat -an | findstr 8888' on Windows or 'netstat -an | grep 8888' on Linux to check if port 8888 is in LISTEN stateAffected if Port 8888 is open and listening for connections
-
Assess network exposureConfirm whether port 8888 is accessible from untrusted networks (check firewall rules, router port forwarding, or use nmap -p 8888 <target> from an external system)Affected if Port 8888 is exposed to untrusted networks or the internet
The system is affected if CloudMe version 1.11.2 or earlier is installed and the service on port 8888 is running and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest patched version of CloudMe if available; otherwise, restrict network access to port 8888 via firewall rules or disable the service until a patch can be applied.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-37070 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-37070 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data