Stack-based Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-121

CVE-2020-37181

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-02-11
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Torrent FLV Converter 1.51 Build 117 contains a stack overflow vulnerability that allows attackers to overwrite Structured Exception Handler (SEH) through a malicious registration code input. Attackers can craft a payload with specific offsets and partial SEH overwrite techniques to potentially execute arbitrary code on vulnerable Windows 32-bit systems.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A stack-based buffer overflow exists in Torrent FLV Converter 1.51 Build 117 within the registration code input field. The vulnerability allows attackers to overwrite the Structured Exception Handler (SEH) on the stack through crafted input with specific offsets, potentially achieving arbitrary code execution on vulnerable 32-bit Windows systems.

MitigationSince this appears to be a legacy/abandoned application, the primary mitigation is to discontinue use and replace with actively maintained software. If continued use is required, input validation and bounds checking must be implemented in the registration handling code to prevent buffer overflows.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Torrent FLV Converter installation
    Look for Torrent FLV Converter in the list of installed programs (Control Panel > Programs and Features) or check common installation directories such as C:\Program Files\Torrent FLV Converter or C:\Program Files (x86)\Torrent FLV Converter
    Affected if The application is present on the system
  2. Identify the installed version
    Right-click the executable file (typically named torrent flv converter.exe or similar) and select Properties, then check the Details tab for the File Version or Product Version information
    Affected if The version is 1.51 Build 117 exactly
  3. Determine system architecture
    Open System Information (msinfo32) and check the System Type field - look for 'x86' indicating 32-bit Windows or 'x64' for 64-bit Windows
    Affected if The system is running a 32-bit (x86) version of Windows; the vulnerability specifically affects 32-bit systems
  4. Verify the registration feature exists
    Launch the application and locate the registration or activation window, typically found under Help > Register, Help > Enter License Key, or similar menu options
    Affected if The application has a registration code input field that accepts user-supplied text

A user is affected if Torrent FLV Converter version 1.51 Build 117 is installed on a 32-bit Windows system and the registration code input field is accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Since this appears to be a legacy/abandoned application, the primary mitigation is to discontinue use and replace with actively maintained software. If continued use is required, input validation and bounds checking must be implemented in the registration handling code to prevent buffer overflows.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-37181 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-37181 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data