CVE-2020-3950
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedVMware Fusion (11.x before 11.5.2), VMware Remote Console for Mac (11.x and prior before 11.0.1) and Horizon Client for Mac (5.x and prior before 5.4.0) contain a privilege escalation vulnerability due to improper use of setuid binaries. Successful exploitation of this issue may allow attackers with normal user privileges to escalate their privileges to root on the system where Fusion, VMRC or Horizon Client is installed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceVMware Fusion, VMRC for Mac, and Horizon Client for Mac contain setuid binaries that improperly handle privilege escalation, allowing authenticated local attackers with standard user privileges to gain root access on affected systems.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.0.0, < 11.5.2>= 5.0.0, < 5.4.0>= 11.0.0, < 11.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed VMware productsLook for VMware Fusion, VMware Horizon Client, or VMware Remote Console in /Applications or by running: ls /Applications | grep -i vmwareAffected if Any of these three products are present on the system
-
Check VMware Fusion versionRun: defaults read /Applications/VMware\ Fusion.app/Contents/Info CFBundleVersion or inspect the Info.plist inside the app bundleAffected if Version is 11.0.0 or higher but lower than 11.5.2
-
Check VMware Horizon Client versionRun: defaults read /Applications/VMware\ Horizon\ Client.app/Contents/Info CFBundleVersion or inspect the Info.plist inside the app bundleAffected if Version is 5.0.0 or higher but lower than 5.4.0
-
Check VMware Remote Console versionRun: defaults read /Applications/VMware\ Remote\ Console.app/Contents/Info CFBundleVersion or inspect the Info.plist inside the app bundleAffected if Version is 11.0.0 or higher but lower than 11.0.1
-
Verify setuid binaries presenceRun: ls -la /Applications/VMware\ Fusion.app/Contents/Library/*.app/Contents/MacOS/* 2>/dev/null | grep 's' | head -5 (repeat for Horizon Client and Remote Console)Affected if Any setuid root binaries exist within the VMware product directories (indicates the vulnerable configuration)
A system is affected if any of the three VMware products are installed and the installed version falls within the vulnerable ranges, especially if setuid binaries are present in the installation directories.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped5.4.011.0.111.5.2
Upgrade to VMware Fusion 11.5.2 or later, VMRC 11.0.1 or later, or Horizon Client for Mac 5.4.0 or later to remediate this vulnerability.
Fusion 11.5.2, Horizon Client 5.4.0, or Remote Console 11.0.1 (depending on product)
- Identify which affected VMware product is installed: Fusion, Horizon Client for Mac, or Remote Console for Mac
- For Fusion users: Download VMware Fusion 11.5.2 or later from vmware.com
- For Horizon Client users: Download Horizon Client 5.4.0 or later from vmware.com
- For Remote Console users: Download VMRC 11.0.1 or later from vmware.com
- Uninstall the current vulnerable version of the product
- Install the downloaded fixed version
- Restart the system if prompted
- Verify the installed version matches or exceeds the fixed version (Fusion >=11.5.2, Horizon Client >=5.4.0, VMRC >=11.0.1)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,904.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3950 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3950 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data