CVE-2020-4267
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM MQ and MQ Appliance 8.0, 9.1 LTS, and 9.1 CD could allow an authenticated user cause a denial of service due to a memory leak. IBM X-Force ID: 175840.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM MQ and MQ Appliance versions 8.0, 9.1 LTS, and 9.1 CD contain a memory leak vulnerability that allows authenticated users to cause a denial of service. An authenticated attacker can exploit this by triggering the memory leak repeatedly until the system becomes unresponsive.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0.0, < 8.0.0.14>= 9.1.0.0, < 9.1.0.4>= 9.1.0, < 9.1.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM MQ versionRun 'dspmqver -a' from the command line to display version information, or check installation directories for version files. On Windows, examine the registry key HKLM\SOFTWARE\IBM\MQSeries\CurrentVersionAffected if Installed version is 8.0.0.0 through 8.0.0.13, or 9.1.0.0 through 9.1.0.3
-
Identify IBM MQ Appliance versionIf using an appliance, log into the appliance CLI and run 'show version' or access the web management console to view the firmware versionAffected if Appliance firmware version is 9.1.0 through 9.1.4
-
Confirm authentication is configuredUse the runmqsc command to check queue manager auth settings with 'DISPLAY AUTHINFO(*) AUTHENDA' or review CONNAUTH settings in the queue manager configurationAffected if Queue manager has authentication enabled and accepts authenticated connections, allowing a logged-in user to trigger the vulnerability
You are affected if your IBM MQ installation is version 8.0.0.0-8.0.0.13, 9.1.0.0-9.1.0.3, or your MQ Appliance is 9.1.0-9.1.4 and authentication is enabled to permit authenticated user access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data8.0.0.149.1.0.49.1.5
Apply the appropriate IBM MQ security patch or upgrade to a fixed version. Monitor system memory usage and implement resource limits for authenticated users to mitigate exploitation while patching.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4267 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4267 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data