CVE-2020-4384
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.3, 11.5, and 11.7 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session. IBM X-Force ID: 179265.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIBM InfoSphere Information Server versions 11.3, 11.5, and 11.7 contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Web UI. Attackers can embed arbitrary JavaScript code that executes in the context of trusted sessions, potentially leading to credential disclosure or session hijacking.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.5= 11.7= 11.3= 11.5= 11.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed IBM InfoSphere Information Server versionCheck the product version through the IBM InfoSphere installation directory, license key files, or by querying the IBM IGS robotools database. Typical version locations include the 'registry.xml' or 'version.info' files in the installation root directory, or use the 'imcl listInstalledPackages' command if IBM Installation Manager is available.Affected if The installed version is 11.3, 11.5, or 11.7 of IBM InfoSphere Information Server, or 11.5 or 11.7 for the On Cloud variant, or 11.3, 11.5, or 11.7 for IBM InfoSphere Qualitystage.
-
Confirm the Web UI component is enabled and accessibleVerify that the IBM InfoSphere Information Server Web UI (typically accessed via /ibm/iis/console or similar endpoint) is currently running and accessible to users. Check the WebSphere or Apache HTTP Server configuration to confirm the Web UI application is deployed and started.Affected if The Web UI component is enabled and accessible, as the XSS vulnerability exists specifically within this interface.
-
Review Web UI input fields for suspicious stored contentInspect user-created or user-editable fields within the Web UI such as job names, project descriptions, metadata repository entries, or data quality rule definitions. Look for encoded or obfuscated JavaScript tags, script element payloads, or event handler attributes (onload, onerror, onmouseover) embedded in these fields.Affected if Arbitrary JavaScript code or HTML tags are found stored in Web UI fields where such content would not be expected or properly encoded.
-
Check Web UI audit logs for XSS injection attemptsReview IBM InfoSphere Information Server Web UI logs and WebSphere Application Server logs for patterns indicative of XSS injection attempts, including repeated occurrences of '<script', 'javascript:', 'onerror=', 'onload=', or other XSS vectors in request parameters.Affected if Logs contain evidence of XSS payloads being submitted to the Web UI, indicating potential exploitation attempts.
You are affected if your IBM InfoSphere Information Server version is 11.3, 11.5, or 11.7 AND the Web UI component is enabled and accessible, as the stored XSS vulnerability exists in this specific interface.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply IBM security patches for CVE-2020-4384. Additionally, implement output encoding and input validation for all user-supplied data in the Web UI, and configure Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS risks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4384 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4384 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data