Financial Transaction ManagerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2020-4560

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-08-03
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. This vulnerability allows users to embed arbitrary JavaScript code in the Web UI thus altering the intended functionality potentially leading to credentials disclosure within a trusted session.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Financial Transaction Manager 3.2.4 contains a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in its Web UI. Attackers can embed arbitrary JavaScript code through user-facing input fields, potentially allowing credential theft or session hijacking within a trusted user session.

MitigationApply IBM's published patch for CVE-2020-4560. Implement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in the Web UI. Consider deploying Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Financial Transaction ManagerApplication
Affected:= 3.2.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed IBM Financial Transaction Manager version
    Locate the IBM FTM installation directory and check the version manifest or product.info file. Typically found in the installation root or /opt/IBM/FTM directory. Use the product's version command or check the about dialog in the Web UI.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 3.2.4.0 or falls within the affected version range
  2. Confirm the Web UI component is enabled
    Check the IBM FTM configuration files (such as server.xml or web.xml in the application server config) to verify the Web UI module is deployed and accessible. Look for the FTMWebUI or equivalent web application context.
    Affected if The Web UI is deployed and accessible to users
  3. Verify user-facing input fields exist in the Web UI
    Access the IBM FTM Web UI login page and navigation menus. Identify input fields that accept user-supplied data such as search fields, transaction identifiers, or parameter entry points.
    Affected if User-facing input fields are present in the Web UI interface
  4. Inspect HTTP response headers for missing security controls
    Use a browser developer tool or curl -I command to examine HTTP responses from the Web UI. Check for X-Content-Type-Options, Content-Security-Policy, and X-XSS-Protection headers.
    Affected if Security headers are absent or weak, indicating the UI may be vulnerable to XSS exploitation

A user is affected if IBM Financial Transaction Manager version 3.2.4.0 is installed and the Web UI with user input fields is accessible without proper security header protections in place.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM's published patch for CVE-2020-4560. Implement proper input validation and output encoding for all user-supplied data in the Web UI. Consider deploying Content Security Policy headers to mitigate XSS execution.

Fix this in Financial Transaction Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4560 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4560 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data