Connect\Application · Ibm

CVE-2020-4587

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-08-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for UNIX 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 is vulnerable to a stack based buffer ovreflow, caused by improper bounds checking. A local attacker could manipulate CD UNIX to obtain root provileges. IBM X-Force ID: 184578.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for UNIX versions 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 6.0.0, and 6.1.0 contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability caused by improper bounds checking. A local attacker can exploit this flaw to manipulate the software and escalate privileges to root.

MitigationApply IBM's security patches for this vulnerability or upgrade to a fixed version when available. Limit local access to trusted users and monitor for unauthorized privilege escalation attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Connect\Application
Affected:= direct
Sterling Connect\Application
Affected:= direct

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if IBM Sterling Connect:Direct is installed
    Search for running processes matching Connect:Direct (such as 'cdunix' or 'Connect:Direct' processes) using commands like 'ps -ef | grep -i direct' or check for installed binaries in standard locations like /opt, /usr/local, or application-specific directories
    Affected if The product is installed and running on the system
  2. Determine the installed version
    Run version detection commands such as 'cdunix -version', 'ndmxldd -version', or check version files in the installation directory. Common locations include the installation root or bin directory
    Affected if The version matches 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 6.0.0, or 6.1.0
  3. Verify the process runs with elevated privileges
    Check the effective user ID of the Connect:Direct process using 'ps -ef | grep <process>' and examine if it runs as root (UID 0)
    Affected if The Connect:Direct process runs as root and the installed version is among the affected versions
  4. Confirm local access exposure
    Review system permissions and local user access controls. Check who can interact with the Connect:Direct installation directory and binaries using 'ls -la' on the installation path and review /etc/passwd for local user accounts
    Affected if Non-privileged local users have access to the affected Connect:Direct installation and the version is vulnerable
  5. Check for evidence of exploitation
    Review system logs (such as /var/log/messages, /var/log/secure, or audit logs) for unusual privilege escalation attempts, unexpected setuid binaries, or unauthorized root account activity
    Affected if Logs show evidence of privilege escalation attempts or unauthorized root access coinciding with Connect:Direct usage

A user is affected if IBM Sterling Connect:Direct for UNIX is installed with version 4.2.0, 4.3.0, 6.0.0, or 6.1.0 and runs with root privileges, allowing a local attacker to potentially exploit the stack-based buffer overflow for privilege escalation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply IBM's security patches for this vulnerability or upgrade to a fixed version when available. Limit local access to trusted users and monitor for unauthorized privilege escalation attempts.

Fix this in Connect\ Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4587 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4587 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data