Curam Social Program ManagementApplication · Ibm

CVE-2020-4779

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-10-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A HTTP Verb Tampering vulnerability may impact IBM Curam Social Program Management 7.0.9 and 7.0.10. By sending a specially-crafted request, an attacker could exploit this vulnerability to bypass security access controls. IBM X-Force ID: 189156.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

HTTP Verb Tampering vulnerability in IBM Curam Social Program Management 7.0.9 and 7.0.10 allows attackers to bypass security access controls by sending specially-crafted requests using alternative HTTP methods (verbs). This occurs when the application improperly validates or inconsistently enforces security checks across different HTTP methods.

MitigationImplement strict validation of HTTP methods at the application level and ensure security access controls are consistently applied regardless of the HTTP verb used. Consider implementing a web application firewall (WAF) as an additional layer of defense.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Curam Social Program ManagementApplication
Affected:= 7.0.9.0= 7.0.10.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed IBM Curam SPM version
    Check the product version through the IBM Curam administration console, installation manifest, or by querying the application server's deployed ear file metadata. Common locations include the version.info file in the installation directory or the 'About' section in the Curam server administration interface.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 7.0.9.0 or 7.0.10.0
  2. Confirm the application is accessible via HTTP
    Verify that the IBM Curam web interface is exposed over HTTP or HTTPS. Check the web server or IBM WebSphere/IBM HTTP Server configuration for the Curam application endpoints.
    Affected if The web interface is accessible and accepts HTTP requests
  3. Identify HTTP endpoint exposure
    Review the web application configuration to determine which URIs and servlets are exposed. Check the web.xml deployment descriptor for defined servlet mappings and their allowed HTTP methods.
    Affected if The application exposes web endpoints that process requests through different HTTP methods (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE, etc.)
  4. Test for inconsistent verb handling (authorized assessment only)
    If authorized, send test requests to known Curam endpoints using various HTTP methods (e.g., GET, POST, HEAD, OPTIONS, PUT, DELETE) and compare the responses. Look for cases where security checks are applied to one verb but not others for the same resource.
    Affected if Security access controls are enforced for some HTTP methods but bypassed or ignored for others on the same endpoint

If the installed version is exactly 7.0.9.0 or 7.0.10.0 and the application exposes HTTP web endpoints, the environment is likely affected by this HTTP verb tampering vulnerability.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict validation of HTTP methods at the application level and ensure security access controls are consistently applied regardless of the HTTP verb used. Consider implementing a web application firewall (WAF) as an additional layer of defense.

Fix this in Curam Social Program Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,690
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4779 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4779 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data