Urbancode DeployApplication · Ibm

CVE-2020-4884

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-03-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 6.2.7.9, 7.0.5.4, and 7.1.1.1 stores user credentials in plain in clear text which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 190908.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM UrbanCode Deploy versions 6.2.7.9, 7.0.5.4, and 7.1.1.1 store user credentials in plaintext rather than using proper encryption or hashing. A local user with access to the system files can read these plaintext credentials, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts and sensitive deployment resources.

MitigationMigrate credentials to a secure credential storage mechanism such as IBM Cloud Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, or implement proper encryption for stored credentials. Rotate all exposed credentials immediately after applying the fix.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Urbancode DeployApplication
Affected:= 6.2.7.9= 7.0.5.4= 7.1.1.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM UrbanCode Deploy installation and version
    Locate the IBM UrbanCode Deploy installation directory and check the version. Common locations include /opt/ibm/ucd or C:\Program Files\ibm\ucd. Look for a version file or use the version command if available. Compare the installed version against 6.2.7.9, 7.0.5.4, and 7.1.1.1.
    Affected if The installed version matches exactly 6.2.7.9, 7.0.5.4, or 7.1.1.1.
  2. Locate credential storage files
    Identify where IBM UrbanCode Deploy stores user credentials. Common locations include the conf or config subdirectory within the installation folder, the server/conf directory, or the data directory. Look for property files, XML configuration files, or database files that contain user authentication data.
    Affected if Credential storage files exist in the IBM UrbanCode Deploy installation directory.
  3. Inspect credential files for plaintext passwords
    Open the identified credential storage files using a text editor or grep command. Search for patterns like password=, Password=, or credentials entries. Check if the password values appear as readable text rather than encrypted strings, hashes, or encoded values.
    Affected if Credentials in the storage files are stored as plaintext readable strings rather than encrypted or hashed values.
  4. Verify encryption mechanism on credential storage
    Examine the credential files or related configuration to determine if any encryption is applied. Look for indicators such as encrypted=true, encryption algorithm specifications, or examine if the values match known encryption patterns. If no encryption library or mechanism is referenced in the configuration, the credentials are likely stored in plaintext.
    Affected if No encryption mechanism is configured or applied to the stored credentials, and they appear as plaintext.

A user is affected if they are running IBM UrbanCode Deploy version 6.2.7.9, 7.0.5.4, or 7.1.1.1 AND their credential storage files contain readable plaintext passwords without encryption or hashing applied.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Migrate credentials to a secure credential storage mechanism such as IBM Cloud Secrets Manager, HashiCorp Vault, or implement proper encryption for stored credentials. Rotate all exposed credentials immediately after applying the fix.

Fix this in Urbancode Deploy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
25.0 hours of engineering $4,400
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4884 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4884 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data