Api ConnectApplication · Ibm

CVE-2020-4899

CRITICAL · 9.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-01-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 5.0.8.10 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM API Connect 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.10 could potentially leak sensitive information or allow for data corruption due to plain text transmission of sensitive information across the network. IBM X-Force ID: 190990.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM API Connect versions 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.10 transmits sensitive information across the network in plain text without encryption, potentially allowing attackers on the same network to intercept sensitive data or inject/modify data during transmission.

MitigationEnable and enforce TLS/SSL encryption for all network communications within the API Connect environment, including all API endpoints, management interfaces, and internal component communications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Api ConnectApplication
Affected:>= 5.0.0.0, <= 5.0.8.10

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed IBM API Connect version
    Locate the API Connect installation and check its version number. This is typically found in the product UI under About/Version information, or via command line tools such as apic version or apic status. Compare your installed version to the affected range of 5.0.0.0 through 5.0.8.10.
    Affected if The installed version falls within 5.0.0.0 to 5.0.8.10 inclusive.
  2. Verify TLS/SSL enforcement on API endpoints
    Review the API Connect gateway configuration and examine whether TLS/SSL is enabled and enforced for all published API endpoints. Check the API assembly or proxy settings to confirm encryption is required for incoming requests.
    Affected if TLS/SSL is not enforced or is optional for API traffic, allowing plain text communications.
  3. Confirm management interface encryption
    Access the API Connect management UI and API Manager settings. Check whether the management console and administrative APIs require HTTPS for all connections. Verify the TLS configuration for the management component.
    Affected if Management interfaces allow unencrypted HTTP access or have TLS disabled.
  4. Inspect internal component communications
    Examine the configuration between API Connect internal components such as the gateway, analytics, portal, and management services. Verify that inter-service communication channels are encrypted with TLS.
    Affected if Internal component-to-component traffic transmits in plain text without encryption.

A user is affected if their IBM API Connect version is between 5.0.0.0 and 5.0.8.10 AND TLS/SSL encryption is not enforced for API endpoints, management interfaces, or internal communications.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 5.0.8.10
Interim mitigation

Enable and enforce TLS/SSL encryption for all network communications within the API Connect environment, including all API endpoints, management interfaces, and internal component communications.

Fix this in Api Connect Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4899 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4899 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data