Urbancode DeployApplication · Ibm

CVE-2020-4944

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-03-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM UrbanCode Deploy (UCD) 7.0.3.0, 7.0.4.0, 7.0.5.3, 7.0.5.4, 7.1.0.0, 7.1.1.0, 7.1.1.1, and 7.1.1.2, stores keystore passwords in plain text after a manual edit, which can be read by a local user. IBM X-Force ID: 191944.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

IBM UrbanCode Deploy stores keystore passwords in plain text within configuration files after a manual edit is performed. A local user with access to the system can read these unencrypted passwords, potentially gaining access to sensitive keystore materials.

MitigationRestrict file system permissions on UCD configuration directories to limit local user access. Rotate any exposed keystore passwords and re-enter them through the official UCD administrative UI rather than manual file edits.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Urbancode DeployApplication
Affected:= 7.0.3.0= 7.0.4.0= 7.0.5.3= 7.0.5.4= 7.1.0.0= 7.1.1.0= 7.1.1.1= 7.1.1.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed IBM UrbanCode Deploy version
    Locate the version file in the UCD installation directory (typically found in server/conf or via the ucd-version command). Compare the version number against the affected list: 7.0.3.0, 7.0.4.0, 7.0.5.3, 7.0.5.4, 7.1.0.0, 7.1.1.0, 7.1.1.1, 7.1.1.2
    Affected if The installed version matches any of the listed affected versions
  2. Locate keystore-related configuration files
    Search the UCD installation directory for configuration files that contain keystore or keypassword settings. Common locations include conf/, config/, or installation-specific subdirectories. Use a text search for patterns such as 'keystore', 'keyPassword', or 'trustStore'
    Affected if Configuration files containing keystore settings exist in the installation directory
  3. Inspect keystore password entries for plain text exposure
    Open the identified keystore configuration files and examine the password fields. Look for entries where keystore or key passwords appear as readable text strings rather than encrypted or masked values
    Affected if Any keystore password field contains plain text (readable alphanumeric strings) instead of encrypted or masked values
  4. Check for manual edits to configuration files
    Review configuration file timestamps or audit logs to determine whether any manual edits were performed on keystore-related config files since installation
    Affected if Manual edits were made to configuration files containing keystore settings and those files now contain plain text passwords

You are affected if your installed version is one of the listed affected versions AND you have manually edited configuration files containing keystore settings, resulting in plain text passwords stored in those files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict file system permissions on UCD configuration directories to limit local user access. Rotate any exposed keystore passwords and re-enter them through the official UCD administrative UI rather than manual file edits.

Fix this in Urbancode Deploy Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-4944 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-4944 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data