CVE-2020-5211
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn NetHack before 3.6.5, an invalid extended command in value for the AUTOCOMPLETE configuration file option can cause a buffer overflow resulting in a crash or remote code execution/privilege escalation. This vulnerability affects systems that have NetHack installed suid/sgid and shared systems that allow users to upload their own configuration files. Users should upgrade to NetHack 3.6.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn NetHack before 3.6.5, the AUTOCOMPLETE configuration file option does not properly validate extended command values, allowing an invalid input to trigger a buffer overflow. On systems where NetHack is installed with suid/sgid permissions, this can lead to privilege escalation, and on shared systems where users can upload custom config files, it enables remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.6.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate NetHack installationRun 'which nethack' or 'which NetHack' to find the executable path, or check common locations like /usr/games/nethack, /usr/bin/nethackAffected if NetHack is not found on the system - not applicable
-
Determine installed NetHack versionRun 'nethack --version' or check the binary with 'nethack -version'. Also check package manager: 'dpkg -l | grep nethack' (Debian) or 'rpm -qa | grep nethack' (RHEL)Affected if Version is lower than 3.6.5 (e.g., 3.6.4, 3.6.3, etc.)
-
Check for user-writable configuration filesInspect NetHack config files: look for ~/.nethackrc, ~/.config/nethack, or /etc/nethackrc. Check file permissions with 'ls -la' to see if other users can modify these filesAffected if Users other than the owner can write to NetHack configuration files, enabling malicious config injection
-
Verify binary permissions (suid/sgid)Run 'ls -l $(which nethack)' to check if the NetHack binary has setuid or setgid bits setAffected if The nethack binary has suid (setuid) or sgid (setgid) permissions, which could allow privilege escalation
-
Check for AUTOCOMPLETE directive in configSearch config files for the string 'AUTOCOMPLETE' using 'grep -r AUTOCOMPLETE ~/.nethackrc ~/.config/nethack/ /etc/nethackrc 2>/dev/null'Affected if An AUTOCOMPLETE directive exists with potentially malformed extended command values
You are affected if NetHack version is below 3.6.5 AND you use custom configuration files with the AUTOCOMPLETE option, especially on systems where the binary has suid/sgid permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.6.5
Upgrade to NetHack 3.6.5 immediately. On shared systems, restrict or audit user-provided configuration files. Consider removing suid/sgid bits from NetHack installations if not strictly required.
NetHack 3.6.5
- Check the current installed NetHack version using 'nethack --version' or similar command
- Obtain NetHack version 3.6.5 from the official NetHack distribution channels (such as GitHub or official NetHack websites)
- Backup any existing NetHack configuration files if desired
- Install NetHack 3.6.5 using the appropriate package manager or compilation process for your system
- If NetHack was previously installed with suid/sgid permissions, verify and restore the correct permissions after upgrading (e.g., chmod u+s and chmod g+s on the NetHack binary)
- Verify the new version is installed correctly by running 'nethack --version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5211 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5211 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data