ConcourseApplication · Pivotal Software

CVE-2020-5409

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-05-14
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.2.8 / 5.5.10 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Pivotal Concourse, most versions prior to 6.0.0, allows redirects to untrusted websites in its login flow. A remote unauthenticated attacker could convince a user to click on a link using the OAuth redirect link with an untrusted website and gain access to that user's access token in Concourse. (This issue is similar to, but distinct from, CVE-2018-15798.)

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Pivotal Concourse versions prior to 6.0.0 contain an open redirect vulnerability in its OAuth login flow. An unauthenticated remote attacker can craft malicious links with untrusted redirect URIs in the OAuth authorization request, causing users' access tokens to be sent to attacker-controlled websites instead of the legitimate Concourse instance.

MitigationUpgrade to Concourse 6.0.0 or later which properly validates OAuth redirect URIs. If immediate upgrade is not possible, review and restrict allowed redirect URIs in the OAuth provider configuration to only trusted domains.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ConcourseApplication
Affected:< 5.2.8>= 5.3.0, < 5.5.10>= 5.6.0, < 5.8.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Concourse version
    Retrieve the installed Concourse version from the web UI footer, the 'fly --version' command, or the deployment configuration. Compare it against the affected ranges: < 5.2.8, >= 5.3.0 and < 5.5.10, >= 5.6.0 and < 5.8.1.
    Affected if The installed version falls within any of the listed affected ranges and is earlier than 6.0.0.
  2. Determine if OAuth login is enabled
    Review the Concourse deployment manifest or configuration files for OAuth-related settings such as 'github', 'generic-oauth', 'gitlab', or other OAuth provider configurations under the 'atc' section.
    Affected if OAuth authentication is configured and active for the Concourse instance.
  3. Inspect OAuth redirect URI configuration
    Examine the OAuth provider configuration for the 'redirect_uri' or 'redirect' parameter. Check whether the configuration allows arbitrary or externally-controlled redirect URIs rather than restricting to a fixed list of trusted domains.
    Affected if The redirect URI is not strictly constrained to a known trusted domain or includes user-supplied input.
  4. Review allowed redirect domains
    Look for parameters such as 'auth-url', 'skip-ssl-validation', or any setting that defines allowed callback endpoints in the OAuth provider block. Verify if the configuration explicitly lists permitted redirect domains or permits open redirects.
    Affected if The configuration permits redirect URIs outside the trusted Concourse domain.

If the Concourse version is in the affected range (< 6.0.0) and OAuth authentication is enabled with insufficiently validated redirect URIs, the instance is vulnerable to CVE-2020-5409.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.2.8 / 5.5.10 / 5.8.1 or later
Fixed in 5.2.85.5.105.8.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Concourse 6.0.0 or later which properly validates OAuth redirect URIs. If immediate upgrade is not possible, review and restrict allowed redirect URIs in the OAuth provider configuration to only trusted domains.

Fix this in Concourse Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,770
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,832.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5409 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5409 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data