CVE-2020-5616
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited[Calendar01], [Calendar02], [PKOBO-News01], [PKOBO-vote01], [Telop01], [Gallery01], [CalendarForm01], and [Link01] [Calendar01] free edition ver1.0.0, [Calendar02] free edition ver1.0.0, [PKOBO-News01] free edition ver1.0.3 and earlier, [PKOBO-vote01] free edition ver1.0.1 and earlier, [Telop01] free edition ver1.0.0, [Gallery01] free edition ver1.0.3 and earlier, [CalendarForm01] free edition ver1.0.3 and earlier, and [Link01] free edition ver1.0.0 allows remote attackers to bypass authentication and log in to the product with administrative privileges via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceMultiple PKOBO free edition products (Calendar01, Calendar02, PKOBO-News01, PKOBO-vote01, Telop01, Gallery01, CalendarForm01, and Link01) contain an authentication bypass vulnerability allowing remote attackers to gain administrative access without valid credentials. The specific attack vector is not disclosed in the advisory.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0= 1.0.0<= 1.0.3<= 1.0.3= 1.0.0<= 1.0.3<= 1.0.1= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed PKOBO productsInspect your web server for directories or applications corresponding to the affected product names: Calendar01, Calendar02, Calendarform01, Gallery01, Link01, Pkobo News01, Pkobo Vote01, or Telop01. Check application listings, file systems, or web server configuration for these components.Affected if Any of these eight PKOBO products are present on the server
-
Determine product versionLocate the version information for the installed PKOBO product. This is typically found in a configuration file, README, about page, or metadata file within the product directory. Compare the discovered version against the affected ranges: Calendar01 (=1.0.0), Calendar02 (=1.0.0), Calendarform01 (<=1.0.3), Gallery01 (<=1.0.3), Link01 (=1.0.0), Pkobo News01 (<=1.0.3), Pkobo Vote01 (<=1.0.1), Telop01 (=1.0.0).Affected if The installed version matches or falls within the specified version ranges for any affected product
-
Verify admin interface exposureDetermine if the administrative interface or login page for the PKOBO product is accessible from the network. Common paths may include /admin, /login, or product-specific admin directories. Test whether these endpoints respond to HTTP requests.Affected if The admin interface is reachable over the network without requiring authentication
-
Check for authentication enforcementAttempt to access restricted admin functions or pages within the PKOBO application. Observe whether the application properly enforces authentication or allows access to administrative features without credentials.Affected if Administrative functions are accessible without valid credentials or authentication can be bypassed
You are affected if any PKOBO product (Calendar01, Calendar02, Calendarform01, Gallery01, Link01, Pkobo News01, Pkobo Vote01, or Telop01) matching the specified versions is installed and its admin interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataSince no patch appears to be available for these free edition products, consider migrating to supported versions or alternative solutions with active security maintenance. If continued use is required, implement network-level access controls (e.g., IP whitelisting, VPN) to limit exposure to untrusted networks.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5616 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5616 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data