CVE-2020-5625
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting vulnerability in XooNIps 3.48 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject an arbitrary script via unspecified vectors.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in XooNIps version 3.48 and earlier allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript or HTML into web pages viewed by other users. The unspecified vector indicates the vulnerability likely exists in a user-supplied input field that is reflected in the application's response without proper output encoding or input validation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.48CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify XooNIps installation versionAccess the administrator interface or check version files in the web root directory to determine the installed version of XooNIpsAffected if The installed version is 3.48 or any version lower than 3.48
-
Confirm XooNIps is accessible via webVerify the application is deployed and accessible by accessing the main URLAffected if The application is live and serving web pages to users
-
Locate user-supplied input handling pointsReview all forms, search fields, file upload fields, and URL parameters that accept user input within the XooNIps applicationAffected if User input fields exist that could be reflected in HTML output without encoding
-
Test for reflected XSS in input fieldsInject a benign test script tag such as <script>alert(1)</script> into visible input fields and observe if the script executes when the page reloads or returnsAffected if User input is reflected in the response without proper output encoding or sanitization
-
Review application response headersInspect HTTP response headers for presence of Content-Security-Policy or X-XSS-Protection headersAffected if Security headers are missing or misconfigured, increasing exposure to XSS attacks
A user is affected if XooNIps version 3.48 or lower is installed and user input is reflected in web pages without proper output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement context-aware output encoding for all user-supplied data before rendering in HTML, combined with robust input validation at entry points. Deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to mitigate XSS execution. Given unspecified vectors, conduct thorough code review of all user input handling routines.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5625 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5625 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data