MagmiApplication · Magmi Project

CVE-2020-5777

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-09-01
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 0.7.24 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
MAGMI versions prior to 0.7.24 are vulnerable to a remote authentication bypass due to allowing default credentials in the event there is a database connection failure. A remote attacker can trigger this connection failure if the Mysql setting max_connections (default 151) is lower than Apache (or another web server) setting MaxRequestWorkers (formerly MaxClients) (default 256). This can be done by sending at least 151 simultaneous requests to the Magento website to trigger a "Too many connections" error, then use default magmi:magmi basic authentication to remotely bypass authentication.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

MAGMI versions before 0.7.24 have a critical authentication bypass vulnerability. Attackers exhaust MySQL connections by sending 151+ simultaneous requests (exceeding default max_connections of 151), causing a 'Too many connections' error. When this database failure occurs, the application falls back to default credentials (magmi:magmi), allowing remote attackers to bypass authentication entirely.

MitigationUpdate MAGMI to version 0.7.24 or later, immediately change the default magmi:magmi credentials to a strong unique password, and configure MySQL max_connections to exceed Apache's MaxRequestWorkers setting to prevent the connection exhaustion condition.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
MagmiApplication
Affected:< 0.7.24

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed MAGMI version
    Locate the MAGMI version file or check the application header/config for version information, typically found in the main MAGMI directory or a version-specific file
    Affected if The installed version is any version before 0.7.24 (e.g., 0.7.23, 0.7.22, etc.)
  2. Verify MAGMI is accessible
    Determine whether the MAGMI web interface (typically at /magmi/web/magmi.php or /magmi/index.php) is reachable from network locations
    Affected if MAGMI is exposed to untrusted network users or the internet
  3. Check for default credentials in use
    Examine the MAGMI configuration file (commonly magmi.ini or similar) to see if the default username 'magmi' with password 'magmi' is configured
    Affected if The default credentials (magmi:magmi) are still active in the configuration
  4. Review MySQL max_connections setting
    Execute 'SHOW VARIABLES LIKE 'max_connections';' in MySQL and compare the value to the Apache MaxRequestWorkers setting in httpd.conf or apache2.conf
    Affected if MySQL max_connections is set to 151 or lower, or is not significantly higher than Apache's MaxRequestWorkers (which could allow connection exhaustion)

Your environment is affected if you are running any MAGMI version below 0.7.24 AND either the default magmi:magmi credentials are still active OR your MySQL max_connections is at or below 151 and could be exhausted by simultaneous requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 0.7.24 or later
Fixed in 0.7.24
Interim mitigation

Update MAGMI to version 0.7.24 or later, immediately change the default magmi:magmi credentials to a strong unique password, and configure MySQL max_connections to exceed Apache's MaxRequestWorkers setting to prevent the connection exhaustion condition.

Recommended fix High confidence

0.7.24

  1. Upgrade MAGMI to version 0.7.24 or later to remediate the authentication bypass vulnerability
  2. After upgrading, change the default magmi:magmi credentials to a strong, unique password to prevent unauthorized access

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Magmi Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5777 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5777 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data