CVE-2020-5888
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn versions 15.1.0-15.1.0.1, 15.0.0-15.0.1.2, and 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, BIG-IP Virtual Edition (VE) may expose a mechanism for adjacent network (layer 2) attackers to access local daemons and bypass port lockdown settings.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceF5 BIG-IP Virtual Edition (VE) versions 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, 15.0.0-15.0.1.2, and 15.1.0-15.1.0.1 contain a vulnerability allowing adjacent network (Layer 2) attackers to bypass port lockdown settings and access local daemons, potentially giving them unauthorized access to internal services that should be protected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.2>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.2>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.2>= 14.0.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.3>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine BIG-IP software versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or 'bigtop -v' from the command line to obtain the installed BIG-IP version.Affected if Version falls within 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, 15.0.0-15.0.1.2, or 15.1.0-15.1.0.1.
-
Verify port lockdown configurationIn the web UI, navigate to Network > Port Lockdown, or via CLI run 'tmsh list sys db port-lockdown' to see if any port lockdown rules are defined.Affected if Port lockdown rules exist and are intended to restrict access to local daemons.
-
Check network interface exposureReview the management interface and self IP addresses via 'tmsh list net self' and 'tmsh list sys management-ip'. Determine if the device is reachable from adjacent Layer 2 networks.Affected if The management interface or self IPs are accessible from untrusted adjacent networks (not isolated by VLAN segmentation).
The environment is affected if the installed BIG-IP version is within the vulnerable ranges AND port lockdown is configured to restrict access AND the device is reachable from adjacent Layer 2 networks that could contain attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data14.1.2.415.0.1.315.1.0.2
Upgrade BIG-IP VE to a version beyond 15.1.0.1, 15.0.1.2, or 14.1.2.3 as specified in the F5 advisory. If immediate patching is not possible, enforce strict Layer 2 access controls and monitor for suspicious adjacent network activity.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5888 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5888 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data