Big Ip Access Policy ManagerApplication · F5

CVE-2020-5897

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-05-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 15.1.0.3 or later.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In versions 7.1.5-7.1.9, there is use-after-free memory vulnerability in the BIG-IP Edge Client Windows ActiveX component.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Use-after-free memory vulnerability in the BIG-IP Edge Client Windows ActiveX component affecting versions 7.1.5 through 7.1.9. This memory corruption flaw could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code or cause a denial of service by freeing memory that is still being accessed.

MitigationUpgrade BIG-IP Edge Client to a version beyond 7.1.9, or disable the vulnerable ActiveX component if upgrading is not immediately feasible.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Big Ip Access Policy ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.1>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.1>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.3>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.2.5>= 15.0.0, <= 15.1.0.3
Big Ip Access Policy Manager ClientApplication
Affected:>= 7.1.5, <= 7.1.9

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed BIG-IP Edge Client version
    Check the installed version of BIG-IP Edge Client Windows by reviewing the program's version information in Add/Remove Programs or by examining the executable file properties. Look for the ActiveX component version information.
    Affected if The installed version is 7.1.5 through 7.1.9 inclusive
  2. Verify ActiveX component presence
    Check if the F5 BIG-IP Edge Client ActiveX component (typically registered as an ActiveX control) is installed on the Windows system. This can be done by examining registered ActiveX controls in the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Code Store Database\Distribution Units or checking for F5-related ActiveX DLL files in the installation directory.
    Affected if The ActiveX component is present on the system
  3. Confirm ActiveX is enabled in Internet Explorer or Edge
    Inspect browser settings or registry to determine whether the F5 ActiveX control is allowed to run. Check browser security settings or look for corresponding registry entries under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Google\Chrome\ExtensionInstallWhitelist or similar browser plugin/extension locations.
    Affected if The ActiveX component is enabled and permitted to run in the browser environment
  4. Check BIG-IP APM version
    If the system runs F5 BIG-IP Access Policy Manager, determine the APM version by reviewing the BIG-IP system version through the management interface or by running 'tmsh show sys version' on the BIG-IP device itself.
    Affected if The APM version falls within 11.6.1-11.6.5.1, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, 13.1.0-13.1.3.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2.5, or 15.0.0-15.1.0.3 AND the Edge Client Windows ActiveX component is deployed

You are affected if BIG-IP Edge Client Windows with ActiveX component version 7.1.5 through 7.1.9 is installed and enabled, or if running a vulnerable BIG-IP APM version with the associated client deployed.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 15.1.0.3
Interim mitigation

Upgrade BIG-IP Edge Client to a version beyond 7.1.9, or disable the vulnerable ActiveX component if upgrading is not immediately feasible.

Fix this in Big Ip Access Policy Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5897 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5897 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data