CVE-2020-5917
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn BIG-IP versions 15.1.0-15.1.0.4, 15.0.0-15.0.1.3, 14.1.0-14.1.2.3, 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.1, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2 and BIG-IQ versions 5.2.0-7.0.0, the host OpenSSH servers utilize keys of less than 2048 bits which are no longer considered secure.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe BIG-IP and BIG-IQ host OpenSSH servers use SSH host keys smaller than 2048 bits, which are considered cryptographically insecure by modern standards. Keys of insufficient length are vulnerable to cryptanalytic attacks, potentially allowing an attacker to recover the private key and impersonate the server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, < 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.4>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, < 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.4>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, < 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.4>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, < 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.4>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, < 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.4>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, < 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.4>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, < 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.4>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.5>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5>= 12.1.0, < 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3>= 14.1.0, < 14.1.2.4>= 15.0.0, < 15.0.1.4>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.0.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or 'bigtop_versions' to determine the installed version and module (such as APM, AFM, Analytics, AAM, ASM, DNS, FPS, GTM)Affected if The version falls within any of these ranges: 11.6.1 to 11.6.5; 12.1.0 to 12.1.5.1; 13.1.0 to 13.1.3; 14.1.0 to 14.1.2.3; 15.0.0 to 15.1.0.3; or 15.1.0 to 15.1.0.4
-
Locate SSH host key filesOn the BIG-IP system, list the SSH host key files typically found in /etc/ssh/ using 'ls -la /etc/ssh/ssh_host_*'Affected if Host key files exist in the standard SSH directory
-
Check RSA host key bit lengthRun 'ssh-keygen -l -f /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key' to display the bit length of the RSA host keyAffected if The reported key length is less than 2048 bits (common weak sizes are 1024 or 2048 bits)
-
Check ECDSA host key bit lengthRun 'ssh-keygen -l -f /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key' to display the bit length of the ECDSA host keyAffected if The reported key length is less than 256 bits (ECDSA curves below P-256 are considered weak)
-
Check DSA host key bit lengthRun 'ssh-keygen -l -f /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key' to check if a DSA key exists and its bit lengthAffected if A DSA host key is present (DSA keys are limited to 1024 bits by OpenSSH and are insecure)
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is within the listed vulnerable ranges AND any SSH host key on the system is smaller than 2048 bits (RSA) or uses weak algorithms like DSA.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data12.1.5.214.1.2.415.0.1.4
Regenerate SSH host keys on all affected devices using RSA keys of at least 2048 bits (preferably 4096 bits) or stronger algorithms like Ed25519, then ensure the new host keys are properly distributed to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5917 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5917 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data