CVE-2020-5938
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP 13.1.0-13.1.3.4, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, and 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, when negotiating IPSec tunnels with configured, authenticated peers, the peer may negotiate a different key length than the BIG-IP configuration would otherwise allow.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIn affected BIG-IP versions, when establishing IPSec tunnels with authenticated peers, the peer can negotiate a different (weaker) key length than what the BIG-IP configuration specifies, allowing potential cryptographic key length downgrade during tunnel establishment.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.4>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.4>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.4>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.4>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.4>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.4>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.4>= 11.6.1, <= 11.6.5.2>= 12.1.0, <= 12.1.5.2>= 13.1.0, <= 13.1.3.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or check the BIG-IP GUI under Dashboard to find the base software versionAffected if The version falls within 11.6.1-11.6.5.2, 12.1.0-12.1.5.2, or 13.1.0-13.1.3.4
-
Determine if IPSec tunnels are configuredReview the BIG-IP network configuration for any active IPSec tunnel definitions using tmsh or the configuration utilityAffected if IPSec tunnels are defined and actively used in the environment
-
Verify IPSec tunnel authentication settingsExamine the IPSec tunnel profile or configuration to determine if the peer is using authenticated mode (such as XAuth, Hybrid, or certificate-based authentication)Affected if The IPSec peer is configured with authenticated mode which allows key length negotiation
-
Inspect IPSec transform set or proposal settingsCheck the IPSec configuration for the encryption algorithm and key length settings defined in the transform set or proposalAffected if The configuration permits multiple key lengths or weaker algorithms (such as 3DES or AES with 128-bit keys) that could be negotiated down
-
Review peer proposal enforcementInspect the IPSec policy to see whether the local configuration enforces specific key lengths or allows the peer to select the algorithmAffected if The local IPSec policy does not enforce minimum key length requirements and permits the peer to dictate the encryption strength
The environment is affected if the BIG-IP version is within the listed vulnerable ranges AND IPSec tunnels are configured with authenticated peers that can negotiate weaker key lengths than intended.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the appropriate F5 hotfix or upgrade to a patched version, and review IPSec tunnel configurations to ensure peer settings enforce the intended key lengths.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5938 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5938 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data