CVE-2020-5941
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedOn BIG-IP versions 16.0.0-16.0.0.1 and 15.1.0-15.1.0.5, using the RESOLV::lookup command within an iRule may cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to generate a core file and restart. This issue occurs when data exceeding the maximum limit of a hostname passes to the RESOLV::lookup command.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP where the RESOLV::lookup iRule command fails to properly validate hostname length, causing the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to crash, generate a core file, and restart when data exceeding the maximum hostname limit is passed to the command.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.1>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.1>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.1>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.1>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.1>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.1>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.1>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.1>= 16.0.0, < 16.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check BIG-IP versionRun 'tmsh show sys version' or access the web UI under Diagnostics > General > Version Info to determine the installed versionAffected if The version falls within 15.1.0 to 15.1.0.4 or 16.0.0 to 16.0.0.3 (the unpatched ranges)
-
Identify iRules using RESOLV::lookupRun 'tmsh list ltm rule all' and search for 'RESOLV::lookup' in the output, or use the web UI to review iRule definitions under Local Traffic > iRulesAffected if Any iRule contains the RESOLV::lookup command
-
Examine RESOLV::lookup usage for hostname handlingReview each iRule found with RESOLV::lookup and examine how hostname or domain name data is passed to the command - look for dynamic data sources such as HTTP headers, URI components, or variable dataAffected if The iRule passes dynamically constructed or potentially oversized hostname data to RESOLV::lookup without length validation
-
Check for TMM crash historyReview /var/log/ltm for TMM crash entries, or run 'tmsh show ltm core' to list core dump filesAffected if Recent TMM crashes or core dumps exist and coincide with RESOLV::lookup iRule execution
You are affected if your BIG-IP version is 15.1.0.x before 15.1.1 or 16.0.0.x before 16.0.1 AND you have iRules using RESOLV::lookup that could pass oversized hostname data to the command.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data15.1.116.0.1
Upgrade BIG-IP to a version beyond 16.0.0.1 and 15.1.0.5 that contains the fix. As a workaround, audit and modify or disable iRules using RESOLV::lookup to ensure they do not pass oversized hostname data.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,992.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5941 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5941 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data