Big Ip Access Policy ManagerApplication · F5

CVE-2020-5943

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-11-05
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 14.1.2.7 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In versions 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7, when a BIG-IP object is created or listed through the REST interface, the protected fields are obfuscated in the REST response, not protected via a SecureVault cryptogram as TMSH does. One example of protected fields is the GTM monitor password.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

In affected F5 BIG-IP versions (14.1.0-14.1.0.1 and 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7), protected fields such as GTM monitor passwords are only obfuscated in REST API responses rather than being secured with SecureVault cryptogram protection like TMSH uses. This creates an information disclosure risk where sensitive credentials could potentially be recovered from REST response data.

MitigationUpgrade BIG-IP to a version beyond 14.1.2.7 or apply the relevant hotfix. Until then, avoid transmitting sensitive data through the REST API and limit REST API access to trusted users only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Big Ip Access Policy ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.0.1>= 14.1.2.5, <= 14.1.2.7
Big Ip Advanced Firewall ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.0.1>= 14.1.2.5, <= 14.1.2.7
Big Ip Advanced Web Application FirewallApplication
Affected:>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.0.1>= 14.1.2.5, <= 14.1.2.7
Big Ip AnalyticsApplication
Affected:>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.0.1>= 14.1.2.5, <= 14.1.2.7
Big Ip Application Acceleration ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.0.1>= 14.1.2.5, <= 14.1.2.7
Big Ip Application Security ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.0.1>= 14.1.2.5, <= 14.1.2.7
Big Ip Ddos Hybrid DefenderApplication
Affected:>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.0.1>= 14.1.2.5, <= 14.1.2.7
Big Ip Domain Name SystemApplication
Affected:>= 14.1.0, <= 14.1.0.1>= 14.1.2.5, <= 14.1.2.7

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check BIG-IP version
    Run 'tmsh show /sys version' or use the REST API endpoint GET /mgmt/tm/sys/version to retrieve the installed version
    Affected if The version is 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 or 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7
  2. Identify GTM monitors with credentials
    Use the REST API GET /mgmt/tm/gtm/monitor/ or examine TMSH output 'list gtm monitor' to locate any GTM monitors that contain password configuration
    Affected if GTM monitors with password fields are configured
  3. Query REST API for sensitive fields
    Make an authenticated REST API request to retrieve GTM monitor configuration and examine the response payload for password or credential fields
    Affected if The API response contains password fields with obfuscated values (e.g., ******* or encoded strings) rather than SecureVault cryptograms

You are affected if your BIG-IP version falls within 14.1.0-14.1.0.1 or 14.1.2.5-14.1.2.7 AND you use GTM monitors with password-protected configurations accessed via the REST API.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 14.1.2.7
Interim mitigation

Upgrade BIG-IP to a version beyond 14.1.2.7 or apply the relevant hotfix. Until then, avoid transmitting sensitive data through the REST API and limit REST API access to trusted users only.

Fix this in Big Ip Access Policy Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-5943 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-5943 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data