CVE-2020-6181
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnder some circumstances the SAML SSO implementation in the SAP NetWeaver (SAP_BASIS versions 702, 730, 731, 740 and SAP ABAP Platform (SAP_BASIS versions 750, 751, 752, 753, 754), allows an attacker to include invalidated data in the HTTP response header sent to a Web user, leading to HTTP Response Splitting vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceHTTP Response Splitting vulnerability in SAP NetWeaver and SAP ABAP Platform's SAML SSO implementation allows attackers to inject invalidated data into HTTP response headers by including malicious content in SAML requests that gets reflected in server responses, potentially enabling cross-site scripting or cache poisoning attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.50= 7.51= 7.52= 7.53= 7.54= 7.02= 7.30= 7.31= 7.40CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed SAP NetWeaver or ABAP Platform versionExecute transaction code 'SM51' to view the SAP system release and kernel version, or use the SAPMMC snap-in to check the system version detailsAffected if The installed version matches 7.02, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40 (NetWeaver) or 7.50, 7.51, 7.52, 7.53, 7.54 (ABAP Platform)
-
Verify SAML SSO is configuredAccess transaction code 'SAML2' or check transaction 'SAML_CONFIG' to determine if SAML Single Sign-On is enabled in the systemAffected if SAML SSO is enabled and configured in the affected version ranges
-
Inspect SAML provider settings for reflected contentIn SAML2 transaction, navigate to the Identity Provider metadata and check the 'Name ID' and assertion consumer service URLs for any user-supplied or dynamic content that could be reflected in HTTP responsesAffected if SAML configuration allows user-influenced data to be reflected in response headers without proper encoding
-
Review HTTP response headers for injection pointsCapture a SAML authentication request using network tracing (transaction 'SM37' or external proxy) and inspect the server responses for unencoded or improperly sanitized header values originating from SAML parametersAffected if HTTP response headers contain unsanitized values from SAML request parameters
-
Check for anomalous header manipulationUse transaction 'SE80' to review custom ICF handlers or custom SAML assertions that modify HTTP response headers, and verify whether input validation is performed on SAML assertion attributes before header insertionAffected if Custom ICF handlers or SAML assertion code modifies headers without input validation
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable SAP NetWeaver (7.02, 7.30, 7.31, 7.40) or ABAP Platform (7.50-7.54) version AND has SAML SSO enabled, with unvalidated content potentially being reflected in HTTP response headers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the relevant SAP security patch for CVE-2020-6181 to the affected SAP_BASIS versions (702, 730, 731, 740 for NetWeaver and 750-754 for ABAP Platform). Review SAML SSO configuration and monitor for anomalous header content in web traffic.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6181 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6181 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data