Disclosure ManagementApplication · Sap

CVE-2020-6209

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-03-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SAP Disclosure Management, version 10.1, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, allowing access to administration accounts by a user with no roles, leading to Missing Authorization Check.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SAP Disclosure Management 10.1 contains a missing authorization check vulnerability where an authenticated user with no assigned roles can access administrative functionality that should be restricted to authorized administrators. This allows privilege escalation through the lack of role-based access control enforcement.

MitigationApply the relevant SAP security patch for CVE-2020-6209 and review user role assignments to ensure proper role-based access controls are configured and enforced for all users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Disclosure ManagementApplication
Affected:= 10.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed SAP Disclosure Management version
    Check the installed version of SAP Disclosure Management in your environment. This can typically be found in the SAP system information, about section, or by querying the SAP system via transaction code SM37 or using SAPlmadmin tool.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 10.1 (as only version 10.1 is listed as affected)
  2. Review user role assignments in the system
    Query the user management system to list all users and their assigned roles. In SAP systems, this can be done via transaction SUIM (User Information System) or by checking the USR02 table. Look for users who have NO roles assigned.
    Affected if There exist authenticated users with zero roles assigned in the system
  3. Verify role-based access control enforcement
    Check if the system properly enforces role-based access controls by attempting to access administrative functions with a user that has no roles assigned. Alternatively, review audit logs or security configurations to confirm whether users without roles can invoke administrative endpoints or functions.
    Affected if Users with no assigned roles can access administrative functionality that should require authorized administrator roles
  4. Inspect user-to-role mapping configuration
    Review the user role assignment configuration in the system. Check the relationship between user accounts and their role assignments to confirm whether all authenticated users should have at least one role assigned for proper access control.
    Affected if The user-to-role mapping allows authenticated users to exist without any role assignment, enabling them to bypass intended access restrictions

You are affected if you are running SAP Disclosure Management version 10.1 and have any authenticated users with no assigned roles who can access administrative functionality that should be restricted to authorized administrators.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant SAP security patch for CVE-2020-6209 and review user role assignments to ensure proper role-based access controls are configured and enforced for all users.

Fix this in Disclosure Management Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
21.0 hours of engineering $3,780
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,048.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6209 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6209 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data