CVE-2020-6294
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedXvfb of SAP Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform, versions - 4.2, 4.3, platform on Unix does not perform any authentication checks for functionalities that require user identity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe Xvfb (X Virtual Framebuffer) component in SAP Business Objects Business Intelligence Platform versions 4.2 and 4.3 on Unix systems lacks authentication checks for functionalities requiring user identity, allowing unauthenticated attackers to access sensitive BI platform functions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 4.2= 4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SAP BusinessObjects installation and versionLocate the BusinessObjects installation directory (commonly under /opt/sap/ or /usr/sap/) and check the version. Use command: cat <install_path>/businessobjects/enterprise_xi40/..properties or check installer logs for version 4.2 or 4.3Affected if The installed version equals 4.2 or 4.3 exactly (not a range, specific versions listed in CVE)
-
Verify Xvfb component presenceCheck if Xvfb is installed on the Unix system: which xvfb-run or dpkg -l | grep xvfb or ps aux | grep Xvfb. Xvfb is typically in /usr/bin/X11/ or similar X11 pathsAffected if Xvfb is installed and running as a process on the system
-
Confirm BusinessObjects is using XvfbCheck BusinessObjects configuration files for Xvfb references, particularly in the CMS or web tier configuration. Look for Xvfb paths in businessobjects configuration directoriesAffected if BusinessObjects is configured to use Xvfb for rendering or headless operations
-
Assess network exposure of Xvfb serviceCheck if Xvfb listens on network ports: netstat -anp | grep Xvfb or ss -tlnp | grep -i xvfb. Review firewall rules and network access controls for X11 port ranges (commonly 6000-6005)Affected if Xvfb is bound to a network interface and accessible from untrusted networks
A system is affected if SAP BusinessObjects version 4.2 or 4.3 is installed with Xvfb running and exposed on the network without authentication controls.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply SAP security patches when available; until then, restrict network access to the Xvfb component using firewalls or network segmentation, and monitor for unauthorized access attempts.
SAP Business Objects BI Platform 4.2 SP06 or later / 4.3 SP03 or later (apply latest available Support Package Stack)
- Review SAP Security Note 2958522 (or the relevant security note for CVE-2020-6294) for this specific vulnerability
- Apply the latest available Support Package Stack (SPS) for your SAP Business Objects BI Platform version
- For version 4.2, apply the latest available patch that addresses this authentication bypass in Xvfb
- For version 4.3, apply the latest available patch that addresses this authentication bypass in Xvfb
- After patching, verify that Xvfb on Unix now properly performs authentication checks for user identity-dependent functionalities
- Test to confirm the fix does not break existing functionality that relies on Xvfb
- If no vendor patch is available, consider restricting network access to Unix servers running Business Objects BI Platform as a temporary mitigation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6294 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6294 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data