ChromeWeb browser · Google

CVE-2020-6484

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-05-21
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 83.0.4103.61 or later.
See remediation →
72/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Insufficient data validation in ChromeDriver in Google Chrome prior to 83.0.4103.61 allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via a crafted request.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Insufficient data validation in ChromeDriver (the WebDriver server for Chromium) allowed a remote attacker to bypass navigation restrictions via crafted HTTP requests. This vulnerability in the ChromeDriver server prior to version 83.0.4103.61 could allow malicious websites or external actors to manipulate browser navigation beyond intended WebDriver protocol constraints.

MitigationUpdate ChromeDriver to version 83.0.4103.61 or later. Ensure ChromeDriver versions are synchronized with Chrome browser versions and restrict network access to ChromeDriver servers in production environments.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
ChromeWeb browser
Affected:< 83.0.4103.61
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 9.0= 10.0
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 31= 32
Backports SleApplication
Affected:= 15.0
LeapOperating system
Affected:= 15.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate ChromeDriver executable
    Run 'which chromedriver' on Linux or search for chromedriver.exe on Windows. Check common paths: /usr/bin/chromedriver, /usr/local/bin/chromedriver, or C:\Program Files\chromedriver.exe
    Affected if ChromeDriver is found on the system
  2. Determine ChromeDriver version
    Run 'chromedriver --version' or 'chromedriver -v' to print the version number
    Affected if Version shown is lower than 83.0.4103.61 (for example, 83.0.4103.0 or earlier)
  3. Check if ChromeDriver server is running
    Run 'netstat -tlnp | grep 9515' or 'ss -tlnp | grep 9515' to see if ChromeDriver is listening on port 9515 (default WebDriver port)
    Affected if ChromeDriver is listening on a network port and is accessible
  4. Verify Chrome browser version
    Run 'google-chrome --version' or 'chrome --version' to check the installed Chrome version
    Affected if Chrome version is below 83.0.4103.61 (note: ChromeDriver and Chrome versions should match)
  5. Assess network exposure
    Review firewall rules and service configurations to determine if ChromeDriver port 9515 is exposed to untrusted networks or accessible from remote hosts
    Affected if ChromeDriver server port is accessible from outside the local host or from untrusted networks

You are affected if ChromeDriver version is below 83.0.4103.61 AND the ChromeDriver server is running and accessible (locally or over network), since an attacker could send crafted HTTP requests to manipulate browser navigation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 83.0.4103.61 or later
Fixed in 83.0.4103.61
Interim mitigation

Update ChromeDriver to version 83.0.4103.61 or later. Ensure ChromeDriver versions are synchronized with Chrome browser versions and restrict network access to ChromeDriver servers in production environments.

Fix this in Chrome Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6484 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6484 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data