Video ClientApplication · Bosch

CVE-2020-6787

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-03-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.7.6.079 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Loading a DLL through an Uncontrolled Search Path Element in the Bosch Video Client installer up to and including version 1.7.6.079 potentially allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on a victim's system. A prerequisite is that the victim is tricked into placing a malicious DLL in the same directory where the installer is started from.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The Bosch Video Client installer up to v1.7.6.079 loads DLLs from its working directory without proper validation, following an uncontrolled search path. An attacker can place a specially crafted malicious DLL in the same directory as the installer; when the victim runs the installer, it loads the attacker's DLL with elevated privileges, enabling arbitrary code execution.

MitigationUsers should run the installer from a clean, trusted directory and avoid placing any files alongside the installer from untrusted sources. The vendor should implement secure DLL loading by using absolute paths, enabling SafeDLLSearchMode, and validating/signing DLLs before loading.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Video ClientApplication
Affected:<= 1.7.6.079

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Find installed Bosch Video Client version
    Check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\{Product GUID} or look in C:\Program Files\Bosch\Video Client for version information
    Affected if The installed version is 1.7.6.079 or lower
  2. Locate the Bosch Video Client installer
    Search for files named 'BoschVideoClient*.exe' or 'BVCSetup*.exe' on the system using File Explorer search or command: dir /s /b C:\*Bosch*Video*Client*.exe
    Affected if The installer exists on the system and can be run
  3. Inspect the directory containing the installer
    Examine all files in the same folder as the installer executable. Look for any .dll files that were not part of the original installer package, especially unfamiliar or recently added DLLs
    Affected if The installer resides in a directory containing additional DLL files from untrusted sources
  4. Verify DLL search path behavior
    Check if SafeDLLSearchMode is enabled on the system: reg query HKLM\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager /v SafeDllSearchMode. A value of 1 means enabled, 0 means disabled
    Affected if SafeDLLSearchMode is disabled (value 0) and the installer is run from a directory with potentially malicious DLLs

You are affected if Bosch Video Client version 1.7.6.079 or lower is installed, or if the installer exists on your system in a directory containing untrusted DLL files that could be loaded via the uncontrolled search path.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.7.6.079
Interim mitigation

Users should run the installer from a clean, trusted directory and avoid placing any files alongside the installer from untrusted sources. The vendor should implement secure DLL loading by using absolute paths, enabling SafeDLLSearchMode, and validating/signing DLLs before loading.

Fix this in Video Client Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing10.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,580
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,928.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6787 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6787 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data