CVE-2020-6960
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe following versions of MAXPRO VMS and NVR, MAXPRO VMS:HNMSWVMS prior to Version VMS560 Build 595 T2-Patch, HNMSWVMSLT prior to Version VMS560 Build 595 T2-Patch, MAXPRO NVR: MAXPRO NVR XE prior to Version NVR 5.6 Build 595 T2-Patch, MAXPRO NVR SE prior to Version NVR 5.6 Build 595 T2-Patch, MAXPRO NVR PE prior to Version NVR 5.6 Build 595 T2-Patch, and MPNVRSWXX prior to Version NVR 5.6 Build 595 T2-Patch contain an SQL injection vulnerability that could give an attacker remote unauthenticated access to the web user interface with administrator-level privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in MAXPRO VMS and NVR web interfaces allows remote unauthenticated attackers to gain administrator-level privileges. The flaw is exploitable without authentication, enabling complete compromise of the video management system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 5.6<= 5.6<= 5.6<= 5.6<= vms560<= vms560CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the MAXPRO NVR or VMS firmware versionAccess the device admin panel or check system information page in the web interface; look for firmware version number displayed (e.g., 5.6 or earlier for NVR models, vms560 or earlier for VMS models)Affected if The displayed firmware version is 5.6 or lower for NVR models (Xe/Se/Pe), or vms560 or lower for VMS models (hnmswvms, hnmswvmslt)
-
Confirm the web interface is accessibleAttempt to reach the device web interface over HTTP/HTTPS (typically ports 80, 443, or 8080); verify the login page loadsAffected if The web interface responds and presents a login page, indicating it is enabled and exposed on the network
-
Check for unauthorized administrator accountsLog into the web interface with administrator credentials and review the user account list under User Management or Users settings; look for unfamiliar accounts with administrator privilegesAffected if Unexpected administrator-level accounts exist that were not created by your organization, indicating potential exploitation
Your environment is affected if the MAXPRO NVR or VMS web interface is accessible and the firmware version is 5.6 or lower (NVR) or vms560 or lower (VMS), as this enables unauthenticated SQL injection exploitation.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to MAXPRO VMS VMS560 Build 595 T2-Patch or later, or NVR 5.6 Build 595 T2-Patch or later. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the web interface and monitor for suspicious SQL patterns in requests.
NVR 5.6 Build 595 T2-Patch (for NVR products) or VMS560 Build 595 T2-Patch (for VMS products)
- Identify the specific MAXPRO product (NVR XE, NVR SE, NVR PE, MPNVRSWXX, HNMSWVMS, or HNMSWVMSLT) and current firmware version
- Obtain the fixed firmware version from the vendor (Honeywell): NVR 5.6 Build 595 T2-Patch for NVR products, or VMS560 Build 595 T2-Patch for VMS products
- Review vendor documentation for firmware upgrade instructions specific to your device
- Apply the firmware upgrade following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure
- After upgrade, verify the firmware version matches the fixed release (NVR 5.6 Build 595 T2-Patch or VMS560 Build 595 T2-Patch)
- Confirm the SQL injection vulnerability is remediated by verifying the web interface is accessible and the specific injection point is no longer vulnerable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,840.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6960 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6960 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data