CimplicityApplication · Ge

CVE-2020-6992

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-04-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.0 or later.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A local privilege escalation vulnerability has been identified in the GE Digital CIMPLICITY HMI/SCADA product v10.0 and prior. If exploited, this vulnerability could allow an adversary to modify the system, leading to the arbitrary execution of code. This vulnerability is only exploitable if an attacker has access to an authenticated session. GE Digital CIMPLICITY v11.0, released January 2020, contains mitigation for this local privilege escalation vulnerability. GE Digital recommends all users upgrade to GE CIMPLICITY v11.0 or newer.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a local privilege escalation vulnerability in GE Digital CIMPLICITY HMI/SCADA v10.0 and prior that allows an authenticated attacker to modify the system and execute arbitrary code. The vulnerability requires local access with an authenticated session, indicating the attacker must first obtain valid credentials to the system.

MitigationUpgrade to GE CIMPLICITY v11.0 or newer, released January 2020, which contains the mitigation for this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
CimplicityApplication
Affected:<= 10.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify GE CIMPLICITY is installed
    Search for CIMPLICITY installation directories or check Windows registry for CIMPLICITY installation keys (typically under HKLM\SOFTWARE\GE Digital or similar locations). Look for folders named 'CIMPLICITY' in Program Files or Program Files (x86).
    Affected if CIMPLICITY is found installed on the system
  2. Determine installed CIMPLICITY version
    Locate version information in the installation directory, typically in a file named 'about.dll', 'version.txt', or within the project's .gpj files. The version may also be visible in the CIMPLICITY project properties or in the SMC (Server Manager Console) under the General tab.
    Affected if The installed version is 10.0 or any version prior to 10.0
  3. Confirm CIMPLICITY services are running
    Open Windows Services (services.msc) and check if CIMPLICITY-related services such as 'CIMPLICITY', 'CimService', or 'GE CIMPLICITY' are present and running. These services handle the HMI/SCADA functionality.
    Affected if CIMPLICITY services are running and the version is 10.0 or earlier
  4. Verify authenticated user access scope
    Check if user accounts with permissions to access the CIMPLICITY project exist on the system. Review Windows local users/groups or domain accounts that have been granted access to CIMPLICITY projects via the user database or Windows authentication.
    Affected if There are valid authenticated user accounts that can log into the CIMPLICITY system locally

The environment is affected if GE CIMPLICITY v10.0 or prior is installed and running with accessible authenticated user accounts, as the privilege escalation requires local access with valid credentials.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to GE CIMPLICITY v11.0 or newer, released January 2020, which contains the mitigation for this vulnerability.

Fix this in Cimplicity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,760
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6992 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6992 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data