CVE-2020-7454
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r360971, 12.1-RELEASE before p5, 11.4-STABLE before r360971, 11.4-BETA1 before p1 and 11.3-RELEASE before p9, libalias does not properly validate packet length resulting in modules causing an out of bounds read/write condition if no checking was built into the module.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA buffer bounds validation vulnerability exists in FreeBSD's libalias module (used for NAT and connection tracking). The module fails to properly validate packet length fields, allowing out-of-bounds read/write operations when modules lack their own bounds checking. This memory corruption vulnerability can be triggered remotely via crafted network packets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.3= 11.4= 12.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FreeBSD versionRun 'uname -r' or 'freebsd-version -k' to obtain the installed FreeBSD version numberAffected if The version begins with 11.3, 11.4, or 12.1 (without the required patch level)
-
Check patch level on 12.1For 12.1 systems, run 'freebsd-version -u' and compare the build identifier against '12.1-RELEASE-p5' or laterAffected if Running 12.1-RELEASE-p4 or earlier without the r360971 stable update
-
Check patch level on 11.4For 11.4 systems, run 'freebsd-version -u' and compare the build identifier against '11.4-BETA1-p1' or later, or '11.4-STABLE' with r360971+Affected if Running 11.4-RELEASE or 11.4-BETA1 without the required patch level
-
Check patch level on 11.3For 11.3 systems, run 'freebsd-version -u' and compare the build identifier against '11.3-RELEASE-p9' or laterAffected if Running 11.3-RELEASE-p8 or earlier without the p9 or later patch
-
Verify libalias module statusRun 'kldstat | grep libalias' or check if NAT-related services (natd, ipfw nat, pf nat) are active, as the vulnerability only affects systems using the libalias functionalityAffected if libalias module is loaded or NAT services are running on a vulnerable FreeBSD version
A system is affected if it runs FreeBSD 11.3, 11.4, or 12.1 without the respective patched version (11.3-RELEASE-p9+, 11.4-STABLE r360971+/11.4-BETA1-p1+, 12.1-STABLE r360971+/12.1-RELEASE-p5+) AND has the libalias module loaded or NAT functionality in use.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate FreeBSD systems to version 12.1-STABLE r360971+, 12.1-RELEASE p5+, 11.4-STABLE r360971+, 11.4-BETA1 p1+, or 11.3-RELEASE p9+ to receive the patched libalias module.
FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE p5+, FreeBSD 11.4-STABLE r360971+, FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE p9+, or preferably FreeBSD 13-STABLE/14-CURRENT
- Identify current FreeBSD version using 'uname -r'
- For FreeBSD 11.3-RELEASE: Apply security patch p9 or later via freebsd-update or upgrade to 11.4/12.x/13.x
- For FreeBSD 11.4-STABLE or 11.4-BETA1: Update to stable branch after r360971 or upgrade to 12.x/13.x
- For FreeBSD 12.1-RELEASE: Apply security patch p5 or later via freebsd-update
- For FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE: Update to stable branch after r360971
- Alternatively, upgrade to FreeBSD 13-STABLE or later for long-term support
- After upgrade, verify libalias module loads correctly and test network address translation functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-7454 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-7454 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data