CVE-2020-7455
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn FreeBSD 12.1-STABLE before r360973, 12.1-RELEASE before p5, 11.4-STABLE before r360973, 11.4-BETA1 before p1 and 11.3-RELEASE before p9, the FTP packet handler in libalias incorrectly calculates some packet length allowing disclosure of small amounts of kernel (for kernel NAT) or natd process space (for userspace natd).
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe FTP packet handler in FreeBSD's libalias library incorrectly calculates packet lengths, leading to an out-of-bounds read that discloses small amounts of kernel memory (for kernel NAT) or natd userspace process memory. This information disclosure vulnerability stems from improper bounds checking in the FTP ALG (Application Layer Gateway).
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.3= 11.4= 12.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FreeBSD base system versionRun 'uname -a' or 'freebsd-version -u' to identify the installed FreeBSD versionAffected if The version is 11.3, 11.4, or 12.1 (or any version matching 11.3-RELEASE through 12.1-RELEASE in the affected range)
-
Verify if natd userspace daemon is running with FTP ALGCheck running processes for natd: 'ps aux | grep natd' and inspect /etc/natd.conf for 'enable_alias' or 'ftp' directivesAffected if natd is running with FTP ALG (libalias) enabled
-
Check if kernel NAT (ipfw nat) with FTP ALG is configuredExamine /etc/rc.conf for 'natd_enable="YES"' or 'firewall_nat_enable="YES"' and review ipfw rules: 'ipfw -a list' for nat configurationAffected if ipfw nat is enabled and FTP traffic passes through the NAT
-
Identify if libalias kernel module is loadedRun 'kldstat | grep libalias' to see if the libalias module is loaded into the kernelAffected if libalias module is loaded and handling FTP traffic
The system is affected only if it runs an affected FreeBSD version (11.3, 11.4, or 12.1) AND has FTP ALG (libalias/natd) actively handling FTP traffic through NAT.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate FreeBSD systems to version 12.1-STABLE r360973 or later, 12.1-RELEASE p5 or later, 11.4-STABLE r360973 or later, or 11.3-RELEASE p9 or later to obtain the patched libalias implementation.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-7455 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-7455 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data