HelpuftclientApplication · Helpu

CVE-2020-7862

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-06-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in agent program of HelpU remote control solution could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands This vulnerability is due to insufficient input santization when communicating customer process.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A command injection vulnerability exists in the HelpU remote control agent program. An authenticated attacker can send specially crafted input through the customer process communication channel that, due to insufficient input sanitization, allows execution of arbitrary operating system commands on the target system.

MitigationImplement proper input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data before using it in system calls. Use parameterized interfaces or safe API functions that avoid shell interpretation of user input.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
HelpuftclientApplication
Affected:= 3.0.0.0
HelpuftserverApplication
Affected:= 3.0.0.0
HelpuserverApplication
Affected:= 1.0.0.2
HelpuviewerApplication
Affected:= 2018.5.21.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed HelpU components
    Check system for installed HelpU software by reviewing installed programs list. On Windows, use Control Panel > Programs and Features, or run 'Get-WmiObject -Class Win32_Product' or check registry at HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for entries containing 'Helpu' or 'HelpU'. On Linux, check package manager listings.
    Affected if Any Helpu Helpuftclient, Helpu Helpuftserver, Helpu Helpuserver, or Helpu Helpviewer is installed on the system.
  2. Determine installed version of HelpU components
    Once a HelpU component is identified, locate its version. Check the program's properties in Programs and Features, examine the executable file properties (right-click the main .exe file > Properties > Details tab), or review version info in the program's installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version matches 3.0.0.0 for Helpuftclient or Helpuftserver, 1.0.0.2 for Helpuserver, or 2018.5.21.0 for Helpuviewer.
  3. Verify customer process communication channel is active
    Affected if The HelpU service is running and its communication channel is accessible to authenticated users.

You are affected if any HelpU component (Helpuftclient, Helpuftserver, Helpuserver, or Helpuviewer) is installed at exactly the affected version AND the service is running with its communication channel accessible to authenticated attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper input validation and sanitization on all user-supplied data before using it in system calls. Use parameterized interfaces or safe API functions that avoid shell interpretation of user input.

Fix this in Helpuftclient Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
32.0 hours of engineering $5,600
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,960.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-7862 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-7862 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data