OS Command InjectionWeakness · CWE-78

CVE-2020-8007

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-11-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The pwrstudio web application of EV Charger (in the server in Circontrol Raption through 5.6.2) is vulnerable to OS command injection via three fields of the configuration menu for ntpserver0, ntpserver1, and pingip.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

OS command injection vulnerability in the pwrstudio web application of Circontrol Raption EV chargers (versions through 5.6.2) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands by injecting malicious payloads into three configuration fields: ntpserver0, ntpserver1, and pingip. This critical flaw provides complete system compromise with no authentication required.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied firmware patch (version 5.6.3 or later) to address the command injection vectors. If patching is immediately unavailable, isolate the EV charger management network segment and restrict web interface access to trusted IPs only.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify pwrstudio web interface accessibility
    Attempt to access the pwrstudio web application on the EV charger by navigating to the device IP address on common HTTP/HTTPS ports (80, 443, 8080). Confirm the login page or dashboard loads.
    Affected if The pwrstudio web interface is accessible from an untrusted network without authentication.
  2. Locate firmware version information
    Log into pwrstudio and navigate to the system information, about, or device status page. Look for a version field displaying the firmware version number.
    Affected if The displayed firmware version is 5.6.2 or lower.
  3. Identify NTP server configuration fields
    Within pwrstudio, locate the network settings or time configuration section. Look for input fields labeled ntpserver0 and ntpserver1 where NTP server addresses can be configured.
    Affected if The ntpserver0 and ntpserver1 configuration fields are present and accessible without authentication.
  4. Identify ping configuration field
    In pwrstudio, locate the diagnostic, network test, or connectivity settings section. Look for a field labeled pingip or similar used to specify an IP address for network testing.
    Affected if The pingip configuration field is present and accepts user input without authentication.
  5. Verify web interface exposure
    Determine if the pwrstudio interface is reachable from external networks by checking firewall rules, port exposures, or network segmentation. Confirm whether the management port is exposed to untrusted networks.
    Affected if The pwrstudio web interface is exposed to the internet or untrusted networks without IP restrictions.

A user is affected if the Raption EV charger runs pwrstudio firmware version 5.6.2 or lower AND the web interface with its ntpserver0, ntpserver1, and pingip configuration fields is accessible without authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied firmware patch (version 5.6.3 or later) to address the command injection vectors. If patching is immediately unavailable, isolate the EV charger management network segment and restrict web interface access to trusted IPs only.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-8007 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-8007 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data