Actionpack Page CachingApplication · Rubyonrails

CVE-2020-8159

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-05-12
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.2.1 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
There is a vulnerability in actionpack_page-caching gem < v1.2.1 that allows an attacker to write arbitrary files to a web server, potentially resulting in remote code execution if the attacker can write unescaped ERB to a view.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The actionpack_page-caching gem versions before 1.2.1 contain a file write vulnerability that allows an attacker to write arbitrary files to the web server filesystem. If the attacker can write unescaped ERB templates, this can lead to remote code execution.

MitigationUpgrade the actionpack_page-caching gem to version 1.2.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Actionpack Page CachingApplication
Affected:< 1.2.1
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if actionpack_page-caching gem is installed
    Run 'gem list actionpack_page-caching' or check the Gemfile.lock for the actionpack_page-caching entry
    Affected if The gem is present in the application dependencies
  2. Determine the installed gem version
    Run 'gem list actionpack_page-caching' to see the installed version number, or inspect the version in Gemfile.lock
    Affected if The version is lower than 1.2.1 (e.g., 1.2.0, 1.1.0, etc.)
  3. Verify page caching is enabled in the application
    Check for 'caches_page' directives in the application's controllers, or look for page caching configuration in config/environments/*.rb files
    Affected if Page caching is actively enabled and used in the Rails application
  4. Check if user-supplied content can influence cached file paths
    Inspect the controller actions using 'caches_page' to see if request parameters (params) or user input are used in the cached page paths
    Affected if User input or dynamic parameters are used to construct cached page paths without proper sanitization

A user is affected if they have actionpack_page-caching gem version below 1.2.1 installed AND page caching is enabled with user input potentially influencing cached file paths.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.2.1 or later
Fixed in 1.2.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade the actionpack_page-caching gem to version 1.2.1 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

actionpack_page-caching gem version >= 1.2.1

  1. Check the current version of actionpack_page-caching gem in your project (examine Gemfile.lock)
  2. Update the actionpack_page-caching gem to version 1.2.1 or later in your Gemfile
  3. Run `bundle update actionpack_page-caching` to apply the upgrade
  4. Verify the updated version is correctly installed by checking Gemfile.lock
  5. Test the application thoroughly, especially any page caching functionality
  6. Deploy the updated application

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Actionpack Page Caching Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation1.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
5.0 hours of engineering $860
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-8159 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-8159 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data